Skip to main content

Informative Gene Set Selection Via Distance Sensitive Rival Penalized Competitive Learning and Redundancy Analysis

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4491))

Abstract

This paper presents an informative gene set selection approach to tumor diagnosis based on the Distance Sensitive Rival Penalized Competitive Learning (DSRPCL) algorithm and redundancy analysis. Since the DSRPCL algorithm can allocate an appropriate number of clusters for an input dataset automatically, we can utilize it to classify the genes (expressed by the gene expression levels of all the samples) into certain basic clusters. Then, we apply the post-filtering algorithm to each basic gene cluster to get the typical and independent informative genes. In this way we can obtain a compact set of informative genes. To test the effectiveness of the selected informative gene set, we utilize the support vector machine (SVM) to construct a tumor diagnosis system based on the express profiles of its genes. It is shown by the experiments that the proposed method can achieve a higher diagnosis accuracy with a smaller number of informative genes and less computational complexity in comparison with the previous ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dudoit, D.S., Fridyand, J., Speed, T.P.: Comparison of Discrimination Methods for the Classification of Tumor Using Gene Expression Data. Journal of American Statistical Association 97, 77–87 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., Vapnik, V.: Gene Selection for Cancer Classification Using Support Vector Machine. Machine Learning 46, 389–422 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, L., Liu, H.: Redundancy Based Feature Selection for Microarray Data. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’04), pp. 737–742 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Golub, T.R., Slonim, D.K., Tamayo, P., et al.: Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring. Science 286, 531–537 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding, C.: Analysis of Gene Expression Profiles: Class Discovery and Leaf Ordering. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB’02), pp. 127–136 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deng, L., Ma, J., Pei, J.: Rank Sum Method for Related Gene Selection and Its Application to Tumor Diagnosis. Chinese Science Bulletin 49, 1652–1657 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo, J., Ma, J.: A Multi-population χ 2 Test Approach to Informative Gene Selection. In: Gallagher, M., Hogan, J.P., Maire, F. (eds.) IDEAL 2005. LNCS, vol. 3578, pp. 406–413. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Koller, D., Sahami, M.: Toward Optimal Feature Selection. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’96), pp. 284–292 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xing, E.P., Jordan, M.I., Karp, R.M.: Feature Selection for High-Dimensional Genomic Microarray Data. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of Machine Learning (ICML’01), pp. 601–608 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bo, T., Jonassen, I.: New Feature Subset Selection Procedures for Classification of Expression Profiles. Genome Biology 3, RESEARCH0017.1–0017.11 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, L., Ma, J.: A Post-Filtering Gene Selection Algorithm Based on Redundancy and Multi-Gene Analysis. International Journal of Information Technology 11, 36–44 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ma, J., Wang, T.: A cost-Function Approach to Rival Penalized Competitive Learning (RPCL). IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 36, 722–737 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, L., Krzyzak, A., Oja, E.: Rival Penalized Competitive Learning for Clustering Analysis, RBF Net, and Curve Detection. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 4, 636–649 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu, C., Chang, C., Lin, C.: A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classification. National Taiwan University. Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, given in the web: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf

  15. Ben-Dor, A., Friedman, N., Yakhini, Z.: Scoring Genes for Relevance. Agilent Technical Report no.AGL-2000-13 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, L., Ma, J. (2007). Informative Gene Set Selection Via Distance Sensitive Rival Penalized Competitive Learning and Redundancy Analysis. In: Liu, D., Fei, S., Hou, ZG., Zhang, H., Sun, C. (eds) Advances in Neural Networks – ISNN 2007. ISNN 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4491. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72383-7_143

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72383-7_143

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72382-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72383-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics