Skip to main content

Applying Pairwise Fusion Matrix on Fusion Functions for Classifier Combination

  • Conference paper
  • 1245 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 4472))

Abstract

We propose a new classifier combination scheme for the ensemble of classifiers. The Pairwise Fusion Matrix (PFM) constructs confusion matrices based on classifier pairs and thus offers the estimated probability of each class based on each classifier pair. These probability outputs can then be combined and the final outputs of the ensemble of classifiers is reached using various fusion functions. The advantage of this approach is the flexibility of the choice of the fusion functions, and the experiments suggest that the PFM combined with the majority voting outperforms the simple majority voting scheme on most of problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Duin, R.P.W.: The Combining Classifier: To Train or Not to Train? In: 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), vol. 2, pp. 765–770 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duin, R.P.W.: Pattern Recognition Toolbox for Matlab 5.0+. Available free at: ftp://ftp.ph.tn.tudelft.nl/pub/bob/prtools

  3. Giacinto, G., Roli, F.: Design of effective neural network ensembles for image classification purposes. Image and Vision Computing 19(9-10), 699–707 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen, L.K., Liisberg, C., Salamon, P.: The error-reject tradeoff. Open Systems and Information Dynamics 4, 159–184 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ho, T.K.: The random space method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(8), 832–844 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, Y.S., Suen, C.Y.: A method of combining multiple experts for the recognition of unconstrained handwritten numerals. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 17, 90–93 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kittler, J., Alkoot, F.M.: Relationship of Sum and Vote Fusion Strategies. In: Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2096, pp. 339–348. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Kittler, J., et al.: On Combining Classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(3), 226–239 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuncheva, L.I., Bezdek, J.C., Duin, R.P.W.: Decision templates for multiple classifier fusion: an experimental comparison. Pattern Recognition 34(2), 299–314 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuncheva, L.I., Whitaker, C.J.: Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles and Their Relationship with the Ensemble Accuracy. Machine Learning 51(2), 181–207 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Raudys, S.: Experts’ boasting in trainable fusion rules. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 25(9), 1178–1182 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruta, D., Gabrys, B.: Analysis of the Correlation between Majority Voting Error and the Diversity Measures in Multiple Classifier Systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Soft Computing (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruta, D., Gabrys, B.: Classifier Selection for Majority Voting. International Journal of Information Fusion, 63–81 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shipp, C.A., Kuncheva, L.I.: Relationships between combination methods and measures of diversity in combining classifiers. International Journal of Information Fusion 3(2), 135–148 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tax, D.M.J., et al.: Combining Multiple Classifiers by Averaging or by Multiplying. Pattern Recognition 33(9), 1475–1485 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Turner, K., Ghosh, J.: Error Correlation and Error Reduction in Ensemble Classifiers. Connection Science 8(3-4), 385–404 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wernecke, K.D.: A coupling procedure for discrimination of mixed data. Biometrics 48, 97–506 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, L., Krzyzak, A., Suen, C.Y.: Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 22(3), 418–435 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lecourtier, Y., et al.: Building Diverse Classifier Outputs to Evaluate the Behavior of Combination Methods: The Case of Two Classifiers. In: Roli, F., Kittler, J., Windeatt, T. (eds.) MCS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3077, pp. 273–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Michal Haindl Josef Kittler Fabio Roli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ko, A.HR., Sabourin, R., de Souza Britto, A. (2007). Applying Pairwise Fusion Matrix on Fusion Functions for Classifier Combination. In: Haindl, M., Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds) Multiple Classifier Systems. MCS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4472. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72523-7_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72523-7_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72481-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72523-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics