Skip to main content

Rough Neural Networks for Complex Concepts

  • Conference paper
Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining and Granular Computing (RSFDGrC 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4482))

Abstract

Rough neural networks aim at hierarchical construction of compound concepts. Although the structure of such concepts is assumed to be more complicated than numbers in case of standard feedforward neural networks, some mechanisms can be generalized to achieve efficient propagation and learning. One of possible generalizations, called the normalizing neural networks, enables to propagate vectors instead of single signals. Neurons take form of multidimensional functions, which model cross-dependencies among importance of particular vector components. In this way, we are able to represent some types of compound concepts using relatively simple neural network structure. As an illustration, we consider the case study related to the task of magnetic resonance images’ segmentation. We put a special emphasis on how the nature of objects and attributes in a given decision system influences the network’s architecture. We also compare our model to other rough-neural approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazan, J.G., et al.: Searching for the complex decision reducts: The case study of the survival analysis. In: Zhong, N., et al. (eds.) ISMIS 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2871, pp. 160–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandana, S., Mayorga, R.V.: Rough Approximation based Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System. In: Proc. of IEEE HIS’2005, Rio, pp. 518–521 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dietterich, T.: Machine learning research: four current directions. AI Magazine 18(4), 97–136 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gibbs, J.W.: Elementary Princinples in Statistical Mechanisms. Dover, Mineola (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaus, M., et al.: Automated Segmentation of MRI of Brain Tumors. Radiology 218, 586–591 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. le Cun, Y.: A theoretical framework for backpropagation. In: Neural Networks – concepts and theory, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lingras, P.: Rough Neural Networks. In: Proc. of IPMU’1996, Granada, pp. 1445–1450 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen, H.S.: Approximate Boolean Reasoning: Foundations and Applications in Data Mining. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets V. LNCS, vol. 4100, pp. 334–506. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Pal, S.K., Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.): Rough-Neural Computing. Cognitive Technologies Series. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ślȩzak, D.: Various approaches to reasoning with frequency-based decision reducts: a survey. In: Polkowski, L., Tsumoto, S., Lin, T.Y. (eds.) Rough Set Methods and Applications: New Developments in Knowledge Discovery in Information Systems, pp. 235–285. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ślȩzak, D., Szczuka, M., Wróblewski, J.: Feedforward Concept Networks. In: Dunin-Kȩplicz, B., et al. (eds.) Monitoring, Security, and Rescue Techniques in Multiagent Systems. Advances in Soft Computing, pp. 281–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ślȩzak, D., Wróblewski, J., Szczuka, M.: Neural Network Architecture for Synthesis of the Probabilistic Rule Based Classifiers. ENTCS 82(4) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Szczuka, M.: Rough Sets and Artificial Neural Networks. In: Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery I & II, Physica Verlag, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Widz, S., Revett, K., Ślȩzak, D.: A Rough Set-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Partial Volume Detection System. In: Pal, S.K., Bandyopadhyay, S., Biswas, S. (eds.) PReMI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3776, pp. 756–761. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ślȩzak, D., Szczuka, M. (2007). Rough Neural Networks for Complex Concepts. In: An, A., Stefanowski, J., Ramanna, S., Butz, C.J., Pedrycz, W., Wang, G. (eds) Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining and Granular Computing. RSFDGrC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4482. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72530-5_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72530-5_69

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72529-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72530-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics