Skip to main content

On Satisfiability Games and the Power of Congestion Games

  • Conference paper
Book cover Algorithmic Aspects in Information and Management (AAIM 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4508))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We introduce and study satisfiability games, a new class of games that can be seen as the non-cooperative version of classical maximum satisfiability problems. We give several results involving these games and mainly focus on their expressiveness. In particular, we show that there exists a strong correspondence between satisfiability games and congestion games. As one of the consequences of our results, we show that each game is isomorphic to a congestion game with player specific payoffs. Thus, each other game can be defined as a particular specialization of congestion games with player specific payoffs and this paper can be considered as a first effort in outlining a classification of non-cooperative games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Tardos, E., Wexler, T.: Near-Optimal Network Design with Selfish Agents. In: Proceedings of STOC 2003, pp. 511–520. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, X., Deng, X.: Settling the Complexity of 2-Player Nash Equilibrium. In: Proceedings of FOCS 2006, pp. 261–272. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christodoulou, G., Koutsoupias, E., Nanavati, A.: Coordination Mechanisms. In: Díaz, J., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Sannella, D. (eds.) ICALP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3142, pp. 345–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christodoulou, G., Mirrokni, V.S., Sidiropoulos, A.: Convergence and Approximation in Potential Games. In: Durand, B., Thomas, W. (eds.) STACS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3884, pp. 349–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Daskalakis, K., Goldberg, P.W., Papadimitriou, C.H.: The Complexity of Computing a Nash Equilibrium. In: Proceedings of STOC 2006, pp. 71–78. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daskalakis, K., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Three-Player Games Are Hard. Technical Report TR05-139, ECCC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fabrikant, A., Papadimitriou, C.H., Talwar, K.: The Complexity of Pure Nash Equilibria. In: Proceedings of STOC 2004, pp. 604–612. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Korilis, Y., Lazar, A.: On the Existence of Equilibria in Non-cooperative Optimal Flow Control. Journal of the ACM 42(3), 584–613 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Worst-case Equilibria. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 404–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. La, R., Anantharam, V.: Optimal Routing Control: Game Theoretic Approach. In: Proceedings of the 1997 CDC Conference (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Milchtaich, I.: Congestion Games with Player Specific Payoff Functions. Games and Economic Behavior 13, 111–124 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Mirrokni, V.S.: Approximation Algorithms for Distributed and Selfish Agents. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (June 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mirrokni, V.S., Vetta, A.: Convergence Issues in Competitive Games. In: Jansen, K., Khanna, S., Rolim, J.D.P., Ron, D. (eds.) RANDOM 2004 and APPROX 2004. LNCS, vol. 3122, pp. 183–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Monderer, D.: Multipotential Games. In: Proceedings of IJCAI, to appear (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Monderer, D., Shapley, L.S.: Potential Games. Games and Economic Behavior 14, 124–143 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Nash, J.: Equilibrium Points in n-person Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36, 48–49 (1950)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Nash, J.: Non-cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics 54(2), 286–295 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenthal, R.W.: A Class of Games Possessing Pure-Strategy Nash Equilibria. International Journal of Game Theory 2, 65–67 (1973)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Shenker, S.J.: Making Greed Work in Networks: a Game-Theoretic Analysis of Switch Service Disciplines. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 3(6), 819–831 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ming-Yang Kao Xiang-Yang Li

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bilò, V. (2007). On Satisfiability Games and the Power of Congestion Games. In: Kao, MY., Li, XY. (eds) Algorithmic Aspects in Information and Management. AAIM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4508. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72870-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72870-2_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72868-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72870-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics