Skip to main content

On External Measures for Validation of Fuzzy Partitions

  • Conference paper
Book cover Foundations of Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing (IFSA 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4529))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The procedure of evaluating the results of a clustering algorithm is know under the term cluster validity. In general terms, cluster validity criteria can be classified in three categories: internal, external and relative. In this work we focus on the external criteria, which evaluate the results of a clustering algorithm based on a pre-specified structure S, that pertains to the data but which is independent of it. Usually S is a crisp partition (i.e. the data labels), and the most common approach for external validation of fuzzy partitions is to apply measures defined for crisp partitions to fuzzy partitions, using crisp partitions derived (hardened) from them. In this paper we discuss fuzzy generalizations of two well known crisp external measures, which are able to assess the quality of a partition U without the hardening of U. We also define a new external validity measure, that we call DNC index, useful for comparing a fuzzy U to a crisp S. Numerical examples based on four real world data sets are given, demonstrating the higher reliability of the DNC index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baraldi, A., Blonda, P.: A survey of fuzzy clustering algorithms for pattern recognition. part I-II. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) 29, 778–801 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bezdek, J.C., Keller, J., Krishnapuram, R., Pal, N.R.: Fuzzy Models and algorithms for pattern recognition and image processing. The handbooks of fuzzy sets series. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitra, S., Pal, S.K.: Fuzzy sets in pattern recognition and machine intelligence. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 156, 381–386 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Höppner, F., Klawonn, F., Kruse, R., Runkler, T.: Fuzzy Cluster Analysis: Methods for Classification Data Analysis and Image Recognition. Wiley, New York (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Akay, M.: Nonlinear Biomedical Signal Processing, Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks, and New Algorithms. Series on Biomedical Engineering. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jain, L.C., Sato-Ilic, M.: Innovations in Fuzzy Clustering: Theory and Applications Theory And Applications. Studies In Fuzziness And Soft Computing. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. de Oliveira, J.V., Pedrycz, W.: Advances in Fuzzy Clustering and its Applications. Wiley, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Theodoridis, S., Koutroubas, K.: Pattern recognition. Academic Press, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Milligan, G., Cooper, M.: A study of comparability of external criteria for hierarchical cluster analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research 21, 441–458 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hubert, L., Arabie, P.: Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 193–218 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fowlkes, E., Mallows, C.: A method of comparing two hieararchical clusterings. Journal of American Statistical Society 78, 553–569 (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Rand, W.: Objective criteria for evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66, 846–850 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Back, C., Hussain, M.: Validity measures for fuzzy partitions. In: Bock, H., Polasek, W. (eds.) Data analysis and information systems, pp. 114–125. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. University of california machine learning repository, http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html

  15. Pal, N.R., Bezdek, J.C.: On cluster validity for the fuzzy c-means model. Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 3, 370–379 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Patricia Melin Oscar Castillo Luis T. Aguilar Janusz Kacprzyk Witold Pedrycz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Di Nuovo, A.G., Catania, V. (2007). On External Measures for Validation of Fuzzy Partitions. In: Melin, P., Castillo, O., Aguilar, L.T., Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W. (eds) Foundations of Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing. IFSA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4529. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72950-1_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72950-1_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72917-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72950-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics