Skip to main content

A Learning-Based Model for Semantic Mapping from Natural Language Questions to OWL

  • Conference paper
Book cover Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms (RSEISP 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4585))

  • 1216 Accesses

Abstract

One of key problems in implementing a dynamic interface between human and agents is how to do semantic mapping from natural language questions to OWL. The paper views the task as a two-class classification problem. A pair of question variable and OWL element is a sample. Two classes of “Matched” and “Unmatched” explain two relations between the question variable and the OWL element in a given sample. Building appropriate semantic mapping is the same as classifying the sample to a “Matched” class by an effective machine learning method and a trained model. Two types of features of samples are selected. Syntactical features denote the syntactical structure of a given sample. Semantic features present multiple relations between the question variable and the OWL element in one sample. Preliminary experimental results show that the sum precision of the learning-based model is better than that of the constraints-based method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, I., Ritchie, G., Thanisch, P.: MASQUE/SQL-An Efficient and Portable Natural Language Query Interface for Relational Database. In: Proc. 6th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert System, Edinburgh (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Androutsopoulos, I., Ritchie, G., Thanisch, P.: Natural Language Interfaces to Databases - An Introduction. Journal of Natural Language Engineering 1(1), 29–81 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein, A., Kaufmann, E., Fuchs, N. et al.: Talking to the Semantic Web - a Controlled English Query Interface for Ontologies. AIS SIGSEMIS Bulletin 2(1), 42–47 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cunningham, H.: Software Architecture for Language Engineering. Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield (June 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jurafsky, D., Martin, J.H.: Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing. In: Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fellbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao, M., Liu, J., Zhong, N., Chen, F.: A Constraints-based Semantic Mapping Method from Natural Language Questions to OWL. In: CIDM’07. Proc. IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, Honolulu, Hawaii, April 1-5, 2007 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P., Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the Making of a Web Ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics 1(1), 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez, V., Pasin, M., Motta, E.: AquaLog: An Ontology-Portable Question-Answering System for the Semantic Web. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 546–562. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Popescu, A., Armanasu, A., Etzioni, O. et al.: Modern Natural Language Interfaces to Databases: Composing Statistical Parsing with Semantic Tractability. In: Proc. 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Geneva (August 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Popescu, A., Etzioni, O., Kautz, H.: Towards a Theory of Natural Language Interfaces to Databases. In: Proc. 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Miami, Florida (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paggio, P., Hansen, D.: Ontology-based Question Analysis in a Multilingual Environment: The MOSES Case Study. In: Proc. OntoLex2004: Ontologies and Lexical Resources in Distributed Environments (May 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tang, L., Mooney, R.: Using Multiple Clause Constructors in Inductive Logic Programming for Semantic Parsing. In: Flach, P.A., De Raedt, L. (eds.) ECML 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2167, pp. 466–477. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Witten, I., Frank, E.: WEKA Machine Learning Algorithms in Jav. In: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marzena Kryszkiewicz James F. Peters Henryk Rybinski Andrzej Skowron

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gao, M., Liu, J., Zhong, N., Liu, C., Chen, F. (2007). A Learning-Based Model for Semantic Mapping from Natural Language Questions to OWL. In: Kryszkiewicz, M., Peters, J.F., Rybinski, H., Skowron, A. (eds) Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms. RSEISP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4585. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73451-2_84

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73451-2_84

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73450-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73451-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics