Skip to main content

A Comparison of Genetic Algorithms for Optimizing Linguistically Informed IR in Question Answering

  • Conference paper
  • 1582 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4733))

Abstract

In this paper we compare four selection strategies in evolutionary optimization of information retrieval (IR) in a question answering setting. The IR index has been augmented by linguistic features to improve the retrieval performance of potential answer passages using queries generated from natural language questions. We use a genetic algorithm to optimize the selection of features and their weights when querying the IR database. With our experiments, we can show that the genetic algorithm applied is robust to strategy changes used for selecting individuals. All experiments yield query settings with improved retrieval performance when applied to unseen data. However, we can observe significant runtime differences when applying the various selection approaches which should be considered when choosing one of these approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tellex, S., Katz, B., Lin, J., Fernandes, A., Marton, G.: Quantitative evaluation of passage retrieval algorithms for question answering. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp. 41–47. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts, I., Gaizauskas, R.: Evaluating passage retrieval approaches for question answering. In: Proceedings of 26th European Conference on Information Retrieval (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Katz, B., Lin, J.: Selectively using relations to improve precision in question answering. In: Proceedings of the EACL 2003 Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Question Answering (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bouma, G., Mur, J., van Noord, G., van der Plas, L., Tiedemann, J.: Linguistic knowledge and question answering (Special Issue on Question Answering Systems). Traitement Automatique des Langues 46(3), 15–39 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bouma, G., Van Noord, G., Malouf, R.: Alpino: Wide coverage computational analysis of Dutch. In: Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands CLIN, 2000, Rodopi (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Apache: Lucene - a high-performance, full-featured text search engine library (2004), http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html

  7. Chen, H.: Machine learning for information retrieval: Neural networks, symbolic learning, and genetic algorithms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46(3), 194–216 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fan, W., Gordon, M.D., Pathak, P.: A generic ranking function discovery framework by genetic programming for information retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 40(4), 587–602 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Horng, J.-T., Yeh, C.-C.: Applying genetic algorithms to query optimization in document retrieval. Information Processing and Management 36(5), 737–759 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boughanem, M., Chrisment, C., Tamine, L.: On using genetic algorithms for multimodal relevance optimization in information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(11), 934–942 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Billhardt, H., Borrajo, D., Maojo, V.: Learning retrieval expert combinations with genetic algorithms. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 11(1), 87–113 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Trotman, A.: Choosing document structure weights. Information Processing and Management 41(2), 243–264 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. López-Pujalte, C., Bote, V.P.G., de Moya Anegón, F.: A test of genetic algorithms in relevance feedback. Inf. Process. Manage. 38(6), 793–805 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Cordón, O., Moya, F., Zarco, C.: A new evolutionary algorithm combining simulated annealing and genetic programming for relevante in fuzzy information retrieval systems. Soft Computing 6, 308–319 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. López-Pujalte, C., Guerrero-Bote, V.P., de Moya-Anegón, F.: Genetic algorithms in relevance feedback: a second test and new contributions. Inf. Process. Manage. 39(5), 669–687 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Roberto Basili Maria Teresa Pazienza

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tiedemann, J. (2007). A Comparison of Genetic Algorithms for Optimizing Linguistically Informed IR in Question Answering. In: Basili, R., Pazienza, M.T. (eds) AI*IA 2007: Artificial Intelligence and Human-Oriented Computing. AI*IA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4733. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74782-6_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74782-6_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74781-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74782-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics