Skip to main content

A Fuzzy Ranking Approach to Data Envelopment Analysis

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4693))

Abstract

One problem with data envelopment analysis (DEA), a prominent evaluation method in social sciences, is its low discriminating power when evaluated units are insufficient or inputs and outputs are too many relative to the number of units. To deal with this problem, we incorporate fuzzy set theory with classical DEA so that a broader aspect of evaluation could be taken into account. We propose a method to encapsulate the efficiencies of an unit in different aspects as a fuzzy efficiency. A fuzzy efficiency is further compared with other fuzzy efficiencies to determine its strength and weakness based on extended fuzzy preference relation. With the strength and weakness of an unit, we aggregate them into a total performance index so that a complete ranking of units is obtained. The method proposed in this paper demonstrates a high discrimination in DEA applications compared to classical DEA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, P., Petersen, N.C.: A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39(10), 1261–1294 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman, L., Sinuany-Stern, Z.: Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis and the data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 100, 629–637 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kacprzyk, J.: Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 18, 105–118 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, H.-S.: A new fuzzy ranking method based on fuzzy preference relation. In: 2000 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man And Cybernetics, pp. 3416–3420. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, H.-S.: Optimal consensus of fuzzy opinions under group decision making environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 132, 303–315 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, H.-S.: On fuzzy preference relation in group decision making. International Journal of Computer Mathematics 82(2), 133–140 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, H.-S.: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for the selection of distribution center. In: Wang, L., Chen, K., Ong, Y.S. (eds.) ICNC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3612, pp. 1290–1299. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, H.-S.: A fuzzy method for evaluating suppliers. In: Wang, L., Jiao, L., Shi, G., Li, X., Liu, J. (eds.) FSKD 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4223, pp. 1035–1043. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, H.-S., Chou, M.-T.: A fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for airline competitiveness evaluation. In: Gabrys, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4252, pp. 902–909. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, H.-S., Lin, K., Fang, H.-H: A fuzzy multiple objective DEA for the human development index. In: Gabrys, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4252, pp. 922–928. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, H.-S., Yeh, C.-H.: A multiple criteria decision making model based on fuzzy multiple objective DEA. In: Gabrys, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4252, pp. 917–921. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Orlovski, S.A.: Decision-making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 90, 155–167 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H., Hogan, A.J.: Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. In: Silkman, R.H. (ed.) Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, pp. 73–105. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Torgersen, A.M., Forsund, F.R., Kittelsen, S.A.C.: Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. The Journal of Productivity Analysis 7, 379–398 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, HS., Shen, PD., Chyr, WL. (2007). A Fuzzy Ranking Approach to Data Envelopment Analysis. In: Apolloni, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4693. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74827-4_160

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74827-4_160

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74826-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74827-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics