Abstract
On discussing the necessary features for a group of agents to argue about their positions and intentions over a specific issue some questions arise: Why do agents interact? Is saving the knowledge generated in the interaction useful? How do agents manage arguments? How do agents dialogue? CBR is an adequate way to tackle such argumentation issues in MAS. This paper clarifies the advances achieved by applying CBR to argumentation in MAS, identifies open issues and proposes new ideas to face future challenges.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. Aamodt and E. Plaza, Case-based reasoning; Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, vol. (7)1: 39–59, 1994.
A. Aamodt, Knowledge-intensive case-based reasoning in Creek. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference (ECCBR-04), pp. 1–15, 2004.
V. Aleven and K.D. Ashley, Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Through a Model and Examples, Empirical Evaluation of an Intelligent Learning Environment. In Proc. of the 8th World Conf. of the Artificial Intelligence in Education Society, pp. 87–94, 1997.
E. Armengol and E. Plaza, Lazy induction of descriptions for relational case-based learning. In Proc. of the Euro. Conf. on Machine Learning (ECML-01), pp. 13–24, 2001.
K.D. Ashley, Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals in Hypo. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. (34): 753–796, 1991.
T.J.M. Bench-Capon, P.E. Dunne, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence, doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.001, 2007.
N. Karacapilidis, et al., Using Case-Based Reasoning for Argumentation with Multiple Viewpoints, In Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on CBR (ICCBR-97), pp. 541–552, July 1997.
N. Karacapilidis and D. Papadias, Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision-making: the HERMES system, Information Systems, vol. 26(4): 259–77, 2001.
S. Modgil, et al., Towards formalising agent argumentation over the viability of human organs for transplantation. Proc. Mexican Int. Conf. on AI (MICAI 05), pp 928–938, 2005.
S. Ontañón and E. Plaza, Learning and Joint Deliberation through Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, In Proceedings of AAMAS-07, 2007.
I. Rahwan, et al., Argumentation-based negotiation. Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(4):343–375, 2003.
I. Rahwan, Guest Editorial: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 11(2): 115–125, 2005.
E.L. Rissland and D.B. Skalak, CABARET: Rule Interpretation in a Hybrid Architecture. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. (34): 839–887, 1991.
E.L. Rissland et al., Bankxx: a program to generate argument through case-based search. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on AI and Law (ICAIL-93), pp 117–124, 1993.
L-K. Soh and C. Tsatsoulis, Agent-Based Argumentative Negotiations with CBR, AAAI Fall Symposium on Negotiation Methods for Autonomous Cooperative Sys., 16–25, 2001.
F. Sørmo, et al., Explanation in Case-Based Reasoning; Perspectives and Goals. Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. (24) 2: 109–143, 2005.
K. Sycara. Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theory and Decision, vol. 28, 1990.
P. Tolchinsky et al., CBR and Argument Schemes for Collaborative Decision Making. In Proceedings of COMMA-06, vol. (144): 71–82. IOS Press, 2006.
J. Vázquez-Salceda et al. The Organ Allocation Process: A Natural Extension of the Carrel Agent-Mediated Electronic Institution, AI Communications, vol. 16(3): 153–165, 2003.
D.N. Walton, E.C.W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press, Albany, NY, USA, 1995.
D.N. Walton, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heras, S., Julián, V., Botti, V. (2007). CBR Contributions to Argumentation in MAS. In: Corchado, E., Corchado, J.M., Abraham, A. (eds) Innovations in Hybrid Intelligent Systems. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 44. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74972-1_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74972-1_40
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74971-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74972-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)