Skip to main content

A Logical Approach to Qualitative and Quantitative Reasoning

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4724))

Abstract

Reasoning with qualitative and quantitative uncertainty is required in some real-world applications [6]. However, current extensions to logic programming with uncertainty support representing and reasoning with either qualitative or quantitative uncertainty. In this paper we extend the language of Hybrid Probabilistic Logic programs [29,27], originally introduced for reasoning with quantitative uncertainty, to support both qualitative and quantitative uncertainty. We propose to combine disjunctive logic programs [10,19] with Extended and Normal Hybrid Probabilistic Logic Programs (EHPP [27] and NHPP [29]) in a unified logic programming framework, to allow directly and intuitively to represent and reason in the presence of both qualitative and quantitative uncertainty. The semantics of the proposed languages are based on the answer sets semantics and stable model semantics of extended and normal disjunctive logic programs [10,19]. In addition, they also rely on the probabilistic answer sets semantics and the stable probabilistic model semantics of EHPP [27] and NHPP [29].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baral, C., et al.: Probabilistic reasoning with answer sets. In: LPNMR (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brewka, G., Dix, J.: Knowledge representation with logic programs. In: Dix, J., Moniz Pereira, L., Przymusinski, T.C. (eds.) LPKR 1997. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1471. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Dekhtyar, A., Dekhtyar, I.: Possible worlds semantics for probabilistic logic programs. In: Demoen, B., Lifschitz, V. (eds.) ICLP 2004, vol. 3132, pp. 137–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dekhtyar, A., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Hybrid probabilistic program. Journal of LP 43(3), 187–250 (2000)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dekhtyar, M., Dekhtyar, A., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Hybrid Probabilistic Programs: Algorithms and Complexity. In: UAI, pp. 160–169 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eiter, T., Lukasiewicz, T.: Probabilistic reasoning about actions in nonmonotonic causal theories. In: UAI, pp. 192–199 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eiter, T., et al.: Declarative problem solving in DLV. In: LBAI (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Gelder, A., Ross, K.A., Schlipf, J.S.: The well-founded semantics for generallogic programs. Journal of ACM 38(3), 620–650 (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: ICSLP. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Computing 9(3-4), 363–385 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Halpern, J., Pearl, J.: Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach. Part I: Causes. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56(4), 843–887 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kersting, K., De Raedt, L.: Bayesian Logic Programs. In: Inductive LP (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kifer, M., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Theory of generalized annotated logic programming and its applications. Journal of Logic Programming 12, 335–367 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Lakshmanan, L.V.S., Sadri, F.: On a theory of probabilistic deductive databases. Journal of TPLP 1(1), 5–42 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Loyer, Y., Straccia, U.: The well-founded semantics in normal logic programs with uncertainty. In: Hu, Z., Rodríguez-Artalejo, M. (eds.) FLOPS 2002, vol. 2441. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Loyer, Y., Straccia, U.: The approximate well-founded semantics for logic programs with uncertainty. In: Int. Symp. on Math. Found. of CS (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lukasiewicz, T.: Probabilistic logic programming. In: JELIA, pp. 388–392 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lukasiewicz, T.: Many-valued disjunctive logic programs with probabilistic semantics. In: Gelfond, M., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G. (eds.) LPNMR 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1730. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandez, J., Minker, J.: Disjunctive deductive databases. In: Voronkov, A. (ed.) LPAR 1992, vol. 624. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Muggleton, S.: Stochastic logic programming. In: International Workshop on ILP (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ng, R.T., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Probabilistic logic programming. Information &Computation 101(2) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ng, R.T., Subrahmanian, V.S.: A semantical framework for supporting subjective and conditional probabilities in deductive databases. ARJ 10(2) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ng, R.T., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Stable semantics for probabilistic deductive databases. Information & Computation 110(1) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Niemela, I., Simons, P.: Efficient implementation of the well-founded and stable model semantics. In: Joint International Conference and Symposium on LP (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Poole, D.: The Independent choice logic for modelling multiple agents under uncertainty. Artificial Intelligence 94(1-2), 7–56 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Poole, D.: Abducing through negation as failure: stable models within the independent choice logic. Journal of Logic Programming 44, 5–35 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Saad, E.: Incomplete knowlege in hybrid probabilistic logic programs. In: JELIA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Saad, E., Pontelli, E.: Towards a more practical hybrid probabilistic logic programming framework. In: PADL (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Saad, E., Pontelli, E.: A new approach to hybrid probabilistic logic programs. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Journal 48(3-4), 187–243 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Vennekens, J., Verbaeten, S., Bruynooghe, M.: Logic programs with annotated disjunctions. In: Demoen, B., Lifschitz, V. (eds.) ICLP 2004, vol. 3132. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saad, E. (2007). A Logical Approach to Qualitative and Quantitative Reasoning. In: Mellouli, K. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4724. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75255-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75256-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics