Skip to main content

Algebraic Structures for Bipolar Constraint-Based Reasoning

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4724))

Abstract

The representation of both scales of cost and scales of benefit is very natural in a decision-making problem: scales of evaluation of decisions are often bipolar. The aim of this paper is to provide algebraic structures for the representation of bipolar rules, in the spirit of the algebraic approaches of constraint satisfaction. The structures presented here are general enough to encompass a large variety of rules from the bipolar literature, as well as having appropriate algebraic properties to allow the use of CSP algorithms such as forward-checking and algorithms based on variable elimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amgoud, L., Bonnefon, J.F., Prade, H.: An argumentation-based approach to multiple criteria decision. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 10–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Bipolar representation and fusionof preferences on the possibilistic logic framework. In: Proc. KR 2002, pp. 421–448 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bistarelli, S., Montanari, U., Rossi, F.: Semiring-based Constraint Solving and Optimization. JACM 44(2), 201–236 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bistarelli, S., Pini, M.S., Rossi, F., Venable, K.B.: Positive and negative preferences. In: Proc. CP 2005 workshop on preferences and soft constraints (Soft 2005) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cacioppo, J.T., Gardner, W.L., Berntson, G.G.: Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1, 3–25 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dechter, R., Rish, I.: Mini-buckets: A general scheme for bounded inference. J. ACM 50(2), 107–153 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois, D., Fargier, H.: Qualitative decision making with bipolar information. In: KR 2006, pp. 286–297 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: Bi-capacities — parts I and II. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 151(2), 211–260 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: Bipolar Sugeno and Choquet integrals. In: Proc. EUROFUSE 2002 Workshop on Information Systems (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Bipolar goals. A possibilisitc logic characterization of preferred choices. In: Proc. ECAI 2004 Workshop on local computation for logics and uncertainty, pp. 13–18 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kohlas, J.: Valuation algebras induced by semirings. Technical Report 04-03, Department of Informatics, University of Fribourg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Larrosa, J., Meseguer, P., Schiex, T., Verfaillie, G.: Reversible DAC and other improvements for solving max-CSP. In: Proc. AAAI 1996, pp. 347–352 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., Tannenbaum, P.H.: The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois Press, Chicago (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pini, M.S., Rossi, F., Venable, K.B., Bistarelli, S.: Bipolar preference problems. In: Proc. ECAI 2006 (poster paper) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pini, M.S., Rossi, F., Venable, K.B., Bistarelli, S.: Modelling and solving bipolar preference problems. In: Proc. 2006 ERCIM workshop on constraints (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schiex, T., Fargier, H., Verfaillie, G.: Valued constraint satisfaction problems: Hard and easy problems. In: Proc. IJCAI 1995, pp. 631–637 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., MacGregor, D.G.: Rational actors or rational fools? Implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics 31, 329–342 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297–323 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson, N.: An order of magnitude calculus. In: Proc. UAI 1995, pp. 548–555 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fargier, H., Wilson, N. (2007). Algebraic Structures for Bipolar Constraint-Based Reasoning. In: Mellouli, K. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4724. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_55

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75255-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75256-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics