Abstract
Following a similar method to that of Mark and Egenhofer (1994), a questionnaire-based experiment tested for possible effects of scale, context and spatial relation type on the acceptability of spatial prepositions. The results suggest that the previous assumption of scale invariance in spatial language is incorrect. The physical world as experienced by humans, and described by human language, is not a fractal: scale appears to change its very physical nature, and hence the meaning of its spatial relations. The experiment demonstrated how scale influences preposition use, and how different preposit-ions appeared to evoke different levels of acceptability in themselves. Context, in terms of object type (solid or liquid), interacted with these factors to demonstrate specific constraints upon spatial language use. The results are discussed in terms of figure-ground relations, as well as the role of human experience and the classification of the world into ’objects’ in different ways at different scales. Since this was a preliminary and artificially-constrained experiment, the need for further research is emphasized.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Egenhofer, M.J., Franzosa, R.: Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5, 161–174 (1991)
Egenhofer, M.J., Herring, J.R.: Categorizing Binary Topological Relations Between Regions, Lines, and Points in Geographic Databases. Technical Report, Department of Surveying Engineering. University of Maine, Orono, Maine (1992)
Peuquet, D.J.: Representations of Geographic Space: toward a conceptual synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 78, 375–394 (1988)
Hernandez, D.: Relative Representation of Spatial Knowledge – The 2D Case. In: Mark, D.M., Frank, A.U. (eds.) Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, pp. 373–385. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991)
Lynch, K.: The Image of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1960)
Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M.: Naïve Geography. In: Kuhn, W., Frank, A.U. (eds.) COSIT 1995. LNCS, vol. 988, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Lautenschütz, A.-K.: Spatial Relations: the influence of scale, context and spatial relation in linguistic topology. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Institut für Geographie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany (2006)
Riedemann, C.: Naming Topological Operators at GIS User Interfaces. In: Toppen, F., Painho, M. (eds.) 8th Conference on Geographic Information Science, Estoril, Portugal, pp. 307–315 (2005)
Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology and Information Systems. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems, pp. 3–15. IOS Press, Trento, Italy (1998)
Schwering, A., Raubal, M.: Spatial Relations for Semantic Similarity Measurement. In: Akoka, J., Liddle, S.W., Song, I.-Y., Bertolotto, M., Comyn-Wattiau, I., van den Heuvel, W.-J., Kolp, M., Trujillo, J., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) Perspectives in Conceptual Modeling. LNCS, vol. 3770, pp. 259–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Mark, D.M., Egenhofer, M.J.: Calibrating the Meanings of Spatial Predicates from Natural Language: Line-Region Relations. In: Sixth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 538–553 (1994)
Coventry, K.R., Garrod, S.C.: Saying, Seeing and Acting: The Psychological Semantics of Spatial Prepositions. Essays in Cognitive Psychology Series. Psychology Press, Hove, New York (2004)
Talmy, L.: How language structures space. In: Pick, H.L., Acredolo, L.P. (eds.) Spatial Orientation - Theory, Research and Application, pp. 225–282. Plenum Press, New York (1983)
Talmy, L.: Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Concept Structuring Systems, vol. I. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2000)
Mark, D.M., Frank, A.U., Egenhofer, M.J., Freundschuh, S.M., McGranaghan, M., White, R.M.: Languages of Spatial Relations. Initiative Two specialist meeting report (NCGIA Technical Paper 89-2). National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (1989)
Pederson, E.: How Many Reference Frames? In: Pierre, S., Barbeau, M., Kranakis, E. (eds.) ADHOC-NOW 2003. LNCS, vol. 2865, pp. 287–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Montello, D.: Scale and Multiple Psychologies of Space. In: Campari, I., Frank, A.U. (eds.) COSIT 1993. LNCS, vol. 716, pp. 312–321. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Hart, G., Temple, S., Mizen, H.: Tales of the River Bank: first thoughts in the development of a topographic ontology. In: Toppen, F., Prastacos, P. (eds.) Proceedings of 7th AGILE Conference, pp. 165–168. Crete University Press, Heraklion, Greece (2004)
Brugman, C.: The Story of "Over". Unpublished Master’s thesis, Linguistics, University of California (1981)
Herskovits, A.: Language and Spatial Cognition: an interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
Landau, B.: Multiple Geometric Representations of Objects in Languages and Language Learners. In: Bloom, P., Peterson, M., Nadel, L., Garrett, M. (eds.) Language and Space, pp. 317–363. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1996)
Golledge, R.G., Stimson, R.J.: Spatial Behavior – A Geographic Perspective. The Guilford Press, New York (1997)
Pederson, E.: Geographic and Manipulable Space in Two Tamil Linguistic Systems. In: Campari, I., Frank, A.U. (eds.) COSIT 1993. LNCS, vol. 716, pp. 294–311. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lautenschütz, AK., Davies, C., Raubal, M., Schwering, A., Pederson, E. (2007). The Influence of Scale, Context and Spatial Preposition in Linguistic Topology. In: Barkowsky, T., Knauff, M., Ligozat, G., Montello, D.R. (eds) Spatial Cognition V Reasoning, Action, Interaction. Spatial Cognition 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4387. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75666-8_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75666-8_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75665-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75666-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)