Abstract
The success of many online services today depends on the company’s ability to persuade users to take specific actions, such as registering or inviting friends. We examined over 50 popular Web services of this kind to understand the influence processes and strategies used. We found that successful online services share a pattern of target behaviors that can be viewed as part of an overall framework. We call this framework the “Behavior Chain for Online Participation.” This paper briefly presents the general idea of a behavior chain and applies it to understanding persuasion patterns found online. We then illustrate the Behavior Chain for Online Participation by applying it to the Web service LinkedIn and other popular services. Future research may identify behavior chains in other domains and develop new research methods for validating behavior chains.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bagozzi, R.P., Dholakia, U.M., Mookerjee, A.: Individual and group bases of social influence in online environments. Media Psychology 8, 95–126 (2006)
Birnbaum, M.H.: Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology 55, 803–832 (2004)
Buller, D.B., Burgoon, J.K.: Interpersonal Deception Theory. Communication Theory 6(3), 203–242 (1996)
Captology.tv. http://captology.tv
Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N.J.: Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology 55(1), 591 (2004)
Danaher, B.G., McKay, H.G., Seeley, J.R.: The information architecture of behavior change websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 7(2) (2005)
Dholakia, U.M., Bagozzi, R.P., Pearo, L.K.: A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing 21(3), 241–263 (2004)
Dillard, J.: The current status of research on sequential-request compliance techniques. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17, 282–288 (1991)
Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)
Fogg, B.J., Nass, C.: How users reciprocate to computers: an experiment that demonstrates behavior change. In: CHI 1997 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Looking To the Future, Atlanta, Georgia, March 22 - 27, 1997, pp. 331–332. ACM Press, New York, NY (1997), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1120212.1120419
Guadagno, R.E., Asher, T., Demaine, L., Cialdini, R.B.: When saying yes leads to saying no: Preference for consistency and the reverse foot-in-the-door effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, 859–867 (2001)
Guadagno, R., Cialdini, R.: Online persuasion and compliance: Social influence on the Internet and beyond. In: Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (ed.) The social net: Human behavior in cyberspace, pp. 91–113. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)
Guéguen, N.: Foot-in-the-door technique and computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior 18(1), 11–15 (2002)
Gueguen, N., Jacob, C.: Fund-Raising on the Web: The Effect of an Electronic Foot-in-the-Door on Donation. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4(6), 705 (2001)
Hars, A., Ou, S.: Working for free? - Motivations for participating in open source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6(2), 25–39 (2001)
Kapoor, N., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G.: How peer photos influence member participation in online communities. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, OR, USA, April 02 - 07, 2005, pp. 1525–1528. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Kelman, H.C.: Compliance, Identification, and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Studies on Attitudes and Communication 2(1), 51–60 (1958)
Khaled, R., Barr, P., Noble, J., Biddle, R.: Investigating Social Software as Persuasive Technology. In: IJsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 104–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com
Schafer, J.B., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: E-commerce recommendation applications. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 5(1/2), 115–153 (2001)
Skitka, L.J., Sargis, E.G.: The Internet as Psychological Laboratory. Annual Review of Psychology 57(1), 529 (2006)
Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., Wolbert, A.: When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and influence of power in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Social Issues 58, 91–107 (2002)
Spector, B.I.: Negotiation as a Psychological Process. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Negotiation 21(4), 607–618 (1977)
Thompson, L.F., Meriac, J.P., Cope, J.G.: Motivating online performance: The influences of goal setting and Internet self-efficacy. Social Science Computer Review 20, 149–160 (2002)
YouTube. http://youtube.com
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fogg, B.J., Eckles, D. (2007). The Behavior Chain for Online Participation: How Successful Web Services Structure Persuasion. In: de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4744. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77005-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77006-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)