Skip to main content

Hierarchical Timetable Construction

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3867))

Abstract

A hierarchical timetable is one made by recursively joining smaller timetables together into larger ones. Hierarchical timetables exhibit a desirable regularity of structure, at the cost of some limitation of choice in construction. This paper describes a method of specifying hierarchical timetables using mathematical operators, and introduces a data structure which supports the efficient and flexible construction of timetables specified in this way. The approach has been implemented in KTS, a web-based high school timetabling system created by the author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adriaen, M., De Causmaecker, P., Demeester, P., Vanden Berghe, G.: Tackling the university course timetabling problem with an aggregation approach. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling, Brno, pp. 330–335 (August 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahuja, R.K., Magnanti, T.L., Orlin, J.B.: Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Apt, K.R.: Principles of Constraint Programming. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burke, E.K., Carter, M. (eds.): PATAT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1408. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burke, E.K., De Causmaecker, P. (eds.): PATAT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2740. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burke, E., Erben, W. (eds.): PATAT 2000. LNCS, vol. 2079. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Burke, E.K., Ross, P. (eds.): Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling. LNCS, vol. 1153. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burke, E.K., Trick, M.A. (eds.): PATAT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3616. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carter, M.W., Laporte, G.: Recent developments in practical course timetabling. In: Burke, E.K., Carter, M. (eds.) PATAT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1408, pp. 3–19. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper, T.B., Kingston, J.H.: The solution of real instances of the timetabling problem. The Computer Journal 36, 645–653 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fizzano, P., Swanson, S.: Scheduling classes on a college campus. Computational Optimization and Applications 16, 279–294 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. van Hoeve, W.J.: A hyper-arc consistency algorithm for the soft alldifferent constraint. In: Wallace, M. (ed.) CP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3258, pp. 679–689. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kingston, J.H.: A tiling algorithm for high school timetabling. In: Burke, E.K., Trick, M.A. (eds.) PATAT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3616, pp. 233–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kingston, J.H.: The KTS high school timetabling web site (Version 1.3) (October 2005), http://www.it.usyd.edu.au/~jeff

  15. Kingston, J.H.: The KTS high school timetabling system. In: Burke, E.K., Rudová, H. (eds.) PATAT 2006. LNCS, vol. 3867, pp. 308–323. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marte, M.: Towards constraint-based school timetabling. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Modelling and Solving Problems with Constraints (at ICAI 2004), pp. 140–154 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Hentenryck, P.: The OPL Optimization Programming Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Werra, D.: An introduction to timetabling. European Journal of Operational Research 19, 151–162 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Edmund K. Burke Hana Rudová

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kingston, J.H. (2007). Hierarchical Timetable Construction. In: Burke, E.K., Rudová, H. (eds) Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling VI. PATAT 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3867. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77345-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77345-0_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77344-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77345-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics