Skip to main content

The Influence of Social Values in Cooperation

  • Conference paper
Book cover Operations Research Proceedings 2007

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP,volume 2007))

Abstract

This paper deals with the topic of cooperation among economic agents in a repeated game with unknown length. There is still little empirical evidence why and under which conditions people cooperate at all in situations such as the prisoner’s dilemma game (PDG). There is extensive literature on the theory of infinitely repeated games and also a large number of explanations for cooperative behaviour. Experimental evidence on the question how future features will affect the behaviour is rare and the classification of the participants into social and selfish oriented types is new in this context.

Modern contract theory deals a lot with the willingness to cooperate. Therefore we raise the question under which conditions cooperation is created in special economic situations (for example in energy contracts).

The present study examines the influence of pre-existing individual differences in social value orientations measured by the outcomes to oneself and others according to the ring measure by McClintock [10]. We run an experiment in the lab and we are able to figure out the high percentage at cooperation in a PDG in which the number of future rounds is unknown and the fact that cooperation is significantly dependent on the type of the subjects’ social value orientation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Dal Bo. Cooperation under the shadow of the future: Experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games. American Economic Review, 95(5):1591–1604, December 2005. Available at http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v95y2005i5p1591-1604.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. W. Griesinger and J. W. Livingston. Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental games. Behavioral Science, 18:173–188, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. H. Kelley and J. Thibaut. Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Wiley, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. P. Knight and A. F. Dubro. Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic social values: An individualized regression and clustering approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1):98–105, 1984. Available at http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=9697715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. M. Kuhlmann and A. F. J. Marshello. Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Personality and of Social Psychology, 32:922–931, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Liebrand, H. Wilke, V. R., and W. F.J.M. Value orientation and conformity. A study using three types of social dilemma games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30(1):77–97, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. W. G. B. Liebrand and G. van Run. The effects of social motives on behavior in social dilemmas in two cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21:86–102, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. McClintock and E. van Avermaet. Social values and rules of fairness: A theoretical perspective. In V. J. Derlaga and J. Grzelaj, editors, Cooperation and Helping Behavior. Theories and Research:43–71. Academic Press, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. G. McClintock. Social motivation — a set of propositions. Behavioral Science, 17:438–454, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. G. McClintock. Social values: Their definition, measurement and development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12:121–137, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Olekalns and P. L. Smith. Social value orientations and strategy choices in competitive negotiations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(6):657–668, 1999. Available at http://psp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/6/657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Feyer, R., Leopold-Wildburger, U., Pickl, S. (2008). The Influence of Social Values in Cooperation. In: Kalcsics, J., Nickel, S. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2007. Operations Research Proceedings, vol 2007. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77903-2_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics