Skip to main content

Restrictions in Process Design: A Case Study on Workflows in Healthcare

  • Conference paper
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4928))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Automating existing processes is as paving cow path compared to major business process reengineering. However, this rather radical approach is not suitable for all business fields. It requires the freedom to modify organizational structures and free core business processes from non-value adding activities. In sectors like healthcare, there are a variety of legal restrictions and treatment guidelines practitioners have to comply with. Hence, freedom to reorganize the organization and to omit non-value adding activities is heavily compromised. In this paper we present findings from a case study that exemplify restrictions in process reorganization and suggest utilizing more moderate approaches to process management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, J., Kugeler, M., Rosemann, M. (eds.): Process Management: A Guide for the Design of Business Processes, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (to appear, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, J., zur Mühlen, M.: Towards a Classification Framework for Application Granularity in Workflow Management Systems. In: Jarke, M., Oberweis, A. (eds.) CAiSE 1999. LNCS, vol. 1626, pp. 411–416. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Borst, F., et al.: Happy Birthday DIOGENE: A Hospital Information System Born 20 Years Ago. International Journal of Medical Informatics 54, 157–167 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burke, J.P.: Infection Control: A Problem for Patient Safety. New England Journal of Medicine 348, 651–656 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, Data Summary from January 1992 through June 2004, Issued October 2004. American Journal of Infection Control 32, 470-485 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dewire, D.T.: Application Service Providers. Information Systems Management 17, 14–19 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. DiMasi, J.A., Hansen, R.W., Grabowski, H.G.: The Price of Innovation: New Estimates of Drug Development Costs. Journal of Health Economics 22, 151–185 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, 1st edn. HarperBusiness, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harmon, P.: Business Process Change: A Manager’s Guide to Improving, Redesigning, and Automating Processes. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Institute of Medicine: Crossing the quality chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kohn, L.T., Corrigan, J.M., Donaldson, M.S. (eds.): To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lenz, R., Reichert, M.: IT Support for Healthcare Processes. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 354–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Magruder, C., Burke, M., Hann, N.E., Ludovic, J.A.: Using Information Technology to Improve the Public Health System. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 11, 123–130 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Object Management Group: Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Specification 1.0 (2006), Available: http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?dtc/06-02-01.pdf

  15. Panzarasa, S., Stefanelli, M.: Workflow Management Systems for Guideline Implementation. Neurological Sciences 27, 245–249 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Porter, M.E.: Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. The Free Press, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pryor, T.A., Hripcsak, G.: The Arden Syntax for Medical Logic Modules. International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 10, 215–224 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Siemens AG: Soarian® (2007), Available: http://www.soarian.com/

  19. Tao, L.: Shifting Paradigms with the Application Service Provider Model. IEEE Computer 34, 32–39 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. The Joint Commission: 2007 National Patient Safety Goals (2007), Available: http://www.jointcommission.org/PatientSafety/NationalPatientSafetyGoals/07_hap_cah_npsgs.htm

  21. The Medical Letter Inc.: Choice of Antibacterial Drugs. Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter 2, 13-26 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. The Medical Letter Inc.: Treatment of Clostridium Difficile-Associated Disease (CDAD). The Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics 48, 89-90 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. TIBCO Software GmbH: TIBCO® Staffware Process Suite (2005), Available: http://bpmleader.tibco.com/de/docs/staffware_processsuite_datasheet.pdf

  24. U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Public Health Service Act. (1944), Available: http://www.fda.gov/opacom/laws/phsvcact/phsvcact.htm

  25. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business Process Management: A Survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Weber, S.G., et al.: Legislative Mandates for Use of Active Surveillance Cultures to Screen for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: Position Statement From the Joint SHEA and APIC Task Force. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 28, 249–260 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Workflow Managment Coalition: Terminology & Glossary 3.0 (1999), Available: http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/TC-1011_term_glossary_v3.pdf

  28. zur Mühlen, M.: Workflow-based Process Controlling: Foundation, Design and Application of Workflow-driven Process Information Systems. Dissertation. Logos, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Arthur ter Hofstede Boualem Benatallah Hye-Young Paik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Becker, J., Janiesch, C. (2008). Restrictions in Process Design: A Case Study on Workflows in Healthcare. In: ter Hofstede, A., Benatallah, B., Paik, HY. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4928. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78238-4_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78238-4_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78237-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78238-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics