Skip to main content

Are Critical Incidents Really Critical for a Customer Relationship? A MIMIC Approach

  • Conference paper
Book cover Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications

Abstract

With increasing duration of a relationship the probability that customers experience specifically negative interaction episodes but also very positive interaction episodes increases. A key question that has not been investigated in the literature concerns the impact of these extreme interaction experiences, referred to as Critical Incidents (CIs) on the quality and strength of consumer-firm relationships. In a sample of customers in a service setting we first demonstrate that indeed the number of negative (positive) CIs possess a negative (positive) and asymmetric impact on measures of relationship quality (satisfaction, trust) and measure of relationship strength (loyalty). Second using a MIMIC approach we further shed light on the question which particular incidents are really critical for a customer firm relationship and which have to be prevented with priority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BARON, R. and KENNY, D. (1986): The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173-1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BAUMEISTER, R. F., BRATSLAVSKY, E., FUNKENAUER, C., and VOHS, K. D. (2001): Bad is Stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5 (4), 323-370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BITNER, M. J., BOOMS, B. H., and TETREAULT, M. S. (1990): The Service Encounter -Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 71-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BOLLEN, K. A. (1989): Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • EDVARDSSON, B. (1992). Service Breakdowns: A Study of Critical Incidents in an Airline. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 3(4), 17-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDVARDSSON, B., and STRANDVIK, T. (2000): Is a Critical Incident Critical for a Cus-tomer Relationship? Managing Service Quality, 10(2), 82-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EICH E, MACAULAY D., and RYAN L. (1994): Mood Dependent Memory for Events of the Personal Past. Journal of Experimental Psychology - General, 123 (2), 201-215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FISKE, S. (1980): Attention and Weight in Person Perception - the Impact of Negative and Extreme Behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38 (6), 889-906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FORGAS, J. P. (1995): Mood and Judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117 (1), 39-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FORNELL, C., JOHNSON, M. D., ANDERSON, E. W., CHA, J., and BRYANT, B. E. (1996): The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purposes, and Findings. Journal of Marketing, 60 (October), 7-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GEYSKENS, I., STEENKAMP, J-B. E. M., and KUMAR, N. (1999): A Meta-Analysis of Sat-isfaction in Marketing Channel Relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (May), 223-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREMLER, D. (2004): The Critical Incident Technique in Service Research. Journal of Ser-vice Research, 7(1), 65-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JÖRESKOG, K. and SÖRBOM, D. (2001): LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAHNEMAN, D. and TVERSKY, A. (1979): Prospect Theory - Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • MORGAN, R. M. and HUNT, S. D. (1994): The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ODEKERKEN-SCHRÖDER, G., van BIRGELEN, M., LEMMINK, J., de RUYTER, K., and WETZELS, M. (2000): Moments of Sorrow and Joy: An Empirical Assessment of the Complementary Value of Critical Incidents in Understanding Customer Service Evalua-tions. European Journal of Marketing, 34(1/2), 107-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROOS, I. (2002): Methods of Investigating Critical Incidents - A Comparative Review. Journal of Service Research, 4 (3), 193-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SINGH, J. and SIRDESHMUKH, D. (2000): Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. Journal of the Academy of the Marketing Science, 28 (1),150-167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STAUSS, B. and HENTSCHEL, B. (1992): Attribute-based versus Incident-based Measure-ment of Service Quality: Results of an Empirical Study in the German Car Service In-dustry. In: P. Kunst and J. Lemmink, (Eds.), Quality Management in Services (59-78).

    Google Scholar 

  • STAUSS, B. and WEINLICH, B. (1997): Process-oriented Measurement of Service Quality - Applying the Sequential Incident Technique. European Journal of Marketing, 31 (1), 33-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SZYMANSKI, D. M. and HENARD, D. H. (2001): Customer Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence. Academy of Marketing Science, 29(1), 16-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAYLOR, S. (1991): Asymmetrical Effects of Positive and Negative Events: The Mobilization-Minimization Hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110 (1), 67-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YBARRA, O. and STEFAN, W. G, (1999): Attributional Orientations and the Prediction of Behavior: The Attribution-Prediction Bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (5),718-728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZEITHAML, V. A. and BITNER, M. J. (2003): Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus across the Firm (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paulssen, M., Sommerfeld, A. (2008). Are Critical Incidents Really Critical for a Customer Relationship? A MIMIC Approach. In: Preisach, C., Burkhardt, H., Schmidt-Thieme, L., Decker, R. (eds) Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_55

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics