Skip to main content

A Comparison of Social Bookmarking with Traditional Search

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4956))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Social bookmarking systems allow users to store links to internet resources on a web page. As social bookmarking systems are growing in popularity, search algorithms have been developed that transfer the idea of link-based rankings in the Web to a social bookmarking system’s data structure. These rankings differ from traditional search engine rankings in that they incorporate the rating of users.

In this study, we compare search in social bookmarking systems with traditional Web search. In the first part, we compare the user activity and behaviour in both kinds of systems, as well as the overlap of the underlying sets of URLs. In the second part, we compare graph-based and vector space rankings for social bookmarking systems with commercial search engine rankings.

Our experiments are performed on data of the social bookmarking system Del.icio.us and on rankings and log data from Google, MSN, and AOL. We will show that part of the difference between the systems is due to different behaviour (e.g. the concatenation of multi-word lexems to single terms in Del.icio.us), and that real-world events may trigger similar behaviour in both kinds of systems. We will also show that a graph-based ranking approach on folksonomies yields results that are closer to the rankings of the commercial search engines than vector space retrieval, and that the correlation is high in particular for the domains that are well covered by the social bookmarking system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adar, E., Weld, D., Bershad, B., Gribble, S.: Why we search: Visualizing and predicting user behavior. In: Proc. WWW 2007, Banff, Canada, pp. 161–170 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bao, S., Xue, G., Wu, X., Yu, Y., Fei, B., Su, Z.: Optimizing web search using social annotations. In: Proc. WWW 2007, Banff, Canada, pp. 501–510 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bar-Ilan, J., Mat-Hassan, M., Levene, M.: Methods for comparing rankings of search engine results. Comput. Networks 50(10), 1448–1463 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Broder, A.Z.: A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum 36(2), 3–10 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chatfield, C.: The analysis of time series: an introduction, 6th edn. CRC Press, Florida (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chien, S., Immorlica, N.: Semantic similarity between search engine queries using temporal correlation. In: Proc. WWW 2005, pp. 2–11. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Golder, S., Huberman, B.A.: The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science 32(2), 198–208 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Schmitz, C., Stumme, G.: Information retrieval in folksonomies: Search and ranking. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 411–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ivorix. Sine-weighted moving average (2007), http://www.ivorix.com/en/products/tech/smooth/smooth.html

  10. Krishna, A.M., Gummadi, P., Druschel, P.: Exploiting social networks for internet search. In: Proc. HotNets-V, pp. 79–84 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. In: Proc. WWW 1998, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 161–172 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pass, G., Chowdhury, A., Torgeson, C.: A picture of search. In: Proc. 1st Intl. Conf. on Scalable Information Systems, ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vlachos, M., Meek, C., Vagena, Z., Gunopulos, D.: Identifying similarities, periodicities and bursts for online search queries. In: Proc. SIGMOD 2004, ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yanbe, Y., Jatowt, A., Nakamura, S., Tanaka, K.: Can social bookmarking enhance search in the web? In: Proc. JCDL 2007, pp. 107–116. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Craig Macdonald Iadh Ounis Vassilis Plachouras Ian Ruthven Ryen W. White

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krause, B., Hotho, A., Stumme, G. (2008). A Comparison of Social Bookmarking with Traditional Search. In: Macdonald, C., Ounis, I., Plachouras, V., Ruthven, I., White, R.W. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4956. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78646-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78646-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78645-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78646-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics