Abstract
A novel approach to argumentation has been started by A. Garcez et al. Inspired by their work, we further go on investigating it, but turn to a more syncretic direction such as the interplay between neural net argumentation and symbolic argumentation. This paper is a sequel to our former one (Part I) [1]. In this paper we address ourselves to the following basic questions that can not be overlooked.
-
1
Can the neural argumentation algorithm compute the fixpoint semantics for formal argumentation?
-
1
Can argumentative dialogues be extracted from the neural net argumentation?
Consequently, we give the positive answers to them. They are beneficial for understanding or characterizing the computation power and outcome of the neural net argumentation from the perspective of the symbolic argumentation. We also exemplify these results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Makiguchi, W., Sawamura, H.: A hybrid argumentation of symbolic and neural net argumentation (part I). In: Proc. of Fourth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 82–101 (2007)
Chesñevar, C.I., Maguitman, G., Loui, R.P.: Logical models of argument. ACM Computing Surveys 32, 337–383 (2000)
Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. J. of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7(1), 25–75 (1997)
Fodor, J.A., Pylyshyn, Z.W.: Connectionism and cognitive architecture. A critical analysis, Cognition 28(1-2), 3–71 (1988)
d’Avila Garcez, A.S., Gabbay, D.M., Lamb, L.C.: Value-based argumentation frameworks as neural-symbolic learning systems. Journal of Logic and Computation 15(6), 1041–1058 (2005)
Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Logics for defeasible argumentation. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 4, pp. 219–318. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002)
Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 429–448 (2003)
Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321–358 (1995)
Makiguchi, W.: A hybrid argumentation of symbolic and neural net argumentation. Graduation Thesis for Bachelor’s degree, (in Japanese, 2007) http://www.cs.ie.niigata-u.ac.jp/~makiguti/HA_gt.pdf
Takahashi, T., Sawamura, H.: A logic of multiple-valued argumentation. In: AAMAS 2004, pp. 800–807. ACM, New York (2005)
Isogai, T., Fukumoto, T., Sawamura, H.: An integrated argumentation environment for arguing agents. In: 2006 IEEE / WIC / ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence(WI 2006), pp. 1077–1078. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Makiguchi, W., Sawamura, H. (2008). A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part II). In: Rahwan, I., Parsons, S., Reed, C. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4946. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78915-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78915-4_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78914-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78915-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)