Skip to main content

Normally Distributed Admissible Choices are Optimal

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Choice and Welfare ((WELFARE))

Generally accepted observable behavior has led to the following classes of continuously differentiable utility functions, u (•):

  1. I.

    Nonsatiation axiom: u′ > 0

  2. II.

    Risk aversion: u′ > 0, u″ < 0

Adopting the notation of (Bawa, 1975), let the uncertain prospects be characterized by random variables xi,i= 1,2,…,n+ 1, with known continuous probability distribution functions defined over an open interval R 1 given by (a, b),a >b.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aboudi, R, & Thon, D. (1994). Efficient algorithms for stochastic dominance tests based on financial data. Management Science, 40, 508–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afriat, S (1967). The construction of a utility function from expenditure data. International Economic Review, 8, 67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, V (1975). Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects. Journal of Financial Economics, 2, 95–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, V. (1979). Lecture notes: Generalized location and scale family of distributions. NYU, unpublished

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, V, Bodurtha, J., Jr., Rao, M. R., & Suri, H. (1985). On determination of stochastic dominance optimal sets. Journal of. Finance, 40, 417–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, V., & Goroff, D. (1982). Admissible efficient, and best choices under uncertainty. University of Texas-Austin, Department of Finance working paper 81/82-2-8, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, V, & Goroff, D. (1983). Stochastic dominance, efficiency and separation in financial markets. Journal of Economic Theory, 30, 410–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, V, Lindenberg, E., & Rafsky, L. (1979). An efficient algorithm to determine stochastic dominance admissible sets. Management Science, 25(7), 609–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodurtha, J., Jr., (2004) Efficient portfolio reallocation for all risk-averse investors. Georgetown University working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig, P, & Ross, S. (1982). Portfolio efficient sets. Econometrica, 50, 1525–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. (1964). Decision and value theory. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P (1974). Convex stochastic dominance with continuous distribution functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 7, 143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. (1975). Convex stochastic dominance. In W. Ziemba, & R. Vickson (Eds.), Stochastic optimization models in finance. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goroff, D, & Whitt, W. (1980). Approximating the admissible set in stochastic dominance. Journal of Economic Theory, 23, 218–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R, & Srivastiva, S. (1986). Expected utility maximization and demand behavior. Journal of Economic Theory, 38, 313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R, & Srivastiva, S. (1985). Risk aversion and arbitrage. Journal of Finance, 50, 257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, J, & Russell, W. (1969). Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. American Economic Review, 59, 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, J, & Russell, W. (1971). Stochastic dominance and diversification. Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 288–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanoch, G, & Levy, H. (1969). The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk. Review of Economic Studies, 36, 335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen, T (2004). Efficient diversification according to stochastic dominance criteria. Management Science, 50, 1390–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J (1979). Mean variance efficient sets and expected utility. Journal of Finance, 34, 1221– 1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, B. (1975). Efficient random variables. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2, 243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, B, & Yaari, M. (1975). A price characterization of efficient random variables. Econometric, 43, 283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R B., Wart, J., & Ferguson, D. (1973). Efficient algorithms for conducting stochastic dominance tests on large numbers of portfolios. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 8, 71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, T (2003). Empirical tests for stochastic dominance efficiency. Journal of Finance, 58, 1905– 1931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, T. (2005). Note on an alternative lpm-related dominating portfolio algorithm. correspondence

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, T, & Levy, H. (2005). Does risk-seeking drive asset prices. Review of Financial Studies, 18, 925–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, J., & Sapasnik, R. (1962). Admissibility and measurable utility functions. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 140–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M, & Stiglitz, J. (1970). Increasing risk I: A definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M, & Stiglitz, J. (1971). Increasing Risk II: Its economic consequences. Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 66–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W (1966). Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business, 39, 119–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H (1982). The non-parametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica, 50, 945–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H (1983). Non-parametric tests of models of investor behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 18, 269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickson, R (1975). Stochastic dominance for decreasing absolute risk aversion. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 10, 799–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, G (1970). Third order stochastic dominance. American Economic Review, 50, 457–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S., & Mayshar, J. (1997). Charaterizing efficient portfolios. Hebrew University of Jerusalem working paper

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James N. Bodurtha Jr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bodurtha, J.N., Shen, Q. (2009). Normally Distributed Admissible Choices are Optimal. In: Brams, S.J., Gehrlein, W.V., Roberts, F.S. (eds) The Mathematics of Preference, Choice and Order. Studies in Choice and Welfare. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79128-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics