Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Computational Intelligence in Automotive Applications pp 101–123Cite as

Neural Networks in Automotive Applications

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 132))

Neural networks are making their ways into various commercial products across many industries. As in aerospace, in automotive industry they are not the main technology. Automotive engineers and researchers are certainly familiar with the buzzword, and some have even tried neural networks for their specific applications as models, virtual sensors, or controllers (see, e.g., [1] for a collection of relevant papers). In fact, a quick search reveals scores of recent papers on automotive applications of NN, fuzzy, evolutionary and other technologies of computational intelligence (CI); see, e.g., [2–4]. However, such technologies are mostly at the stage of research and not in the mainstream of product development yet. One of the reasons is “black-box” nature of neural networks. Other, perhaps more compelling reasons are business conservatism and existing/legacy applications (trying something new costs money and might be too risky) [5, 6].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ronald K. Jurgen (ed). Electronic Engine Control Technologies, 2nd edition. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bruce D. Bryant and Kenneth A. Marko, “Case example 2: data analysis for diagnostics and process monitoring of automotive engines”, in Ben Wang and Jay Lee (eds), Computer-Aided Maintenance: Methodologies and Practices. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 1999, pp. 281–301.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Tascillo and R. Miller, “An in-vehicle virtual driving assistant using neural networks,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), vol. 3, July 2003, pp. 2418–2423.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dragan Djurdjanovic, Jianbo Liu, Kenneth A. Marko, and Jun Ni, “Immune systems inspired approach to anomaly detection and fault diagnosis for engines,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2007, Orlando, FL, 12–17 August 2007, pp. 1375–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Chiu, “Developing commercial applications of intelligent control,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 94–100, 1997.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. A.K. Kordon, “Application issues of industrial soft computing systems,” in Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 2005. NAFIPS 2005. Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 26–28 June 2005, pp. 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.K. Kordon, Applied Soft Computing, Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Bloch, F. Lauer, and G. Colin, “On learning machines for engine control.” Chapter 8 in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K.A. Marko, J. James, J. Dosdall, and J. Murphy, “Automotive control system diagnostics using neural nets for rapid pattern classification of large data sets,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 1989, vol. 2, Washington, DC, July 1989, pp. 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.V. Puskorius and L.A. Feldkamp, “Neurocontrol of nonlinear dynamical systems with Kalman filter trained recurrent networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 279–297, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Naozumi Okuda, Naoki Ishikawa, Zibo Kang, Tomohiko Katayama, and Toshio Nakai, “HILS application for hybrid system development,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2007-01-3469, Warrendale, PA, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oleg Yu. Gusikhin, Nestor Rychtyckyj, and Dimitar Filev, “Intelligent systems in the automotive industry: applications and trends,” Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 147–168, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Haykin. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Genevieve B. Orr and Klaus-Robert Müller (eds). Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1524. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.M. Bishop. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Normand L. Frigon and David Matthews. Practical Guide to Experimental Design. New York: Wiley, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sven Meyer and Andreas Greff, “New calibration methods and control systems with artificial neural networks,” SAE Technical Paper no. 2002-01-1147, Warrendale, PA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Schoggl, H.M. Koegeler, K. Gschweitl, H. Kokal, P. Williams, and K. Hulak, “Automated EMS calibration using objective driveability assessment and computer aided optimization methods,” SAE Technical Paper no. 2002-01-0849, Warrendale, PA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bin Wu, Zoran Filipi, Dennis Assanis, Denise M. Kramer, Gregory L. Ohl, Michael J. Prucka, and Eugene DiValentin, “Using artificial neural networks for representing the air flow rate through a 2.4-Liter VVT Engine,” SAE Technical Paper no. 2004-01-3054, Warrendale, PA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. U. Schoop, J. Reeves, S. Watanabe, and K. Butts, “Steady-state engine modeling for calibration: a productivity and quality study,” in Proc. MathWorks Automotive Conference ’07, Dearborn, MI, 19–20 June 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Wu, Z.S. Filipi, R.G. Prucka, D.M. Kramer, and G.L. Ohl, “Cam-phasing optimization using artificial neural networks as surrogate models – fuel consumption and NO x emissions,” SAE Technical Paper no. 2006-01-1512, Warrendale, PA, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Paul B. Deignan Jr., Peter H. Meckl, and Matthew A. Franchek, “The MI – RBFN: mapping for generalization,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Anchorage, AK, 8–10 May 2002, pp. 3840–3845.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Iakovos Papadimitriou, Matthew D. Warner, John J. Silvestri, Johan Lennblad, and Said Tabar, “Neural network based fast-running engine models for control-oriented applications,” SAE Technical Paper no. 2005-01-0072, Warrendale, PA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Specht, “Probabilistic neural networks,” Neural Networks, vol. 3, pp. 109–118, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. B. Wu, Z.S. Filipi, R.G. Prucka, D.M. Kramer, and G.L. Ohl, “Cam-phasing optimization using artificial neural networks as surrogate models – maximizing torque output,” SAE Technical Paper no. 2005-01-3757, Warrendale, PA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Silvia Ferrari and Robert F. Stengel, “Smooth function approximation using neural networks,” IEEE Trans- actions on Neural Networks, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 24–38, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. N.A. Gershenfeld. Nature of Mathematical Modeling. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. Gershenfeld, B. Schoner, and E. Metois, “Cluster-weighted modelling for time-series analysis,” Nature, vol. 397, pp. 329–332, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D. Prokhorov, L. Feldkamp, and T. Feldkamp, “A new approach to cluster weighted modeling,” in Proc. of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Washington DC, July 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Hafner, M. Weber, and R. Isermann, “Model-based control design for IC-engines on dynamometers: the toolbox ‘Optimot’,” in Proc. 15th IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain, 21–26 July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dara Torkzadeh, Julian Baumann, and Uwe Kiencke, “A Neuro Fuzzy Approach for Anti-Jerk Control,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0361, Warrendale, PA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Danil Prokhorov, “Toyota Prius HEV neurocontrol and diagnostics,” Neural Networks, vol. 21, pp. 458–465, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. K.A. Marko, J.V. James, T.M. Feldkamp, G.V. Puskorius, L.A. Feldkamp, and D. Prokhorov, “Training recurrent networks for classification,” in Proceedings of the World Congress on Neural Networks, San Diego, 1996, pp. 845–850.

    Google Scholar 

  34. L.A. Feldkamp, D.V. Prokhorov, C.F. Eagen, and F. Yuan, “Enhanced multi-stream Kalman filter training for recurrent networks,” in J. Suykens and J. Vandewalle (eds), Nonlinear Modeling: Advanced Black-Box Techniques. Boston: Kluwer, 1998, pp. 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  35. L.A. Feldkamp and G.V. Puskorius, “A signal processing framework based on dynamic neural networks with application to problems in adaptation, filtering and classification,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2259–2277, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Neural Network Competition at IJCNN 2001, Washington DC, http://www.geocities.com/ijcnn/challenge.html (GAC).

  37. G. Jesion, C.A. Gierczak, G.V. Puskorius, L.A. Feldkamp, and J.W. Butler, “The application of dynamic neural networks to the estimation of feedgas vehicle emissions,” in Proc. World Congress on Computational Intelligence. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 1, 1998, pp. 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  38. R. Jarrett and N.N. Clark, “Weighting of parameters in artificial neural network prediction of heavy-duty diesel engine emissions,” SAE Technical Paper no. 2002-01-2878, Warrendale, PA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  39. I. Brahma and J.C. Rutland, “Optimization of diesel engine operating parameters using neural networks,” SAE Technical Paper no. 2003-01-3228, Warrendale, PA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  40. M.L. Traver, R.J. Atkinson, and C.M. Atkinson, “Neural network-based diesel engine emissions prediction using in-cylinder combustion pressure,” SAE Technical Paper no. 1999-01-1532, Warrendale, PA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  41. L. del Re, P. Langthaler, C. Furtmüller, S. Winkler, and M. Affenzeller, “ NO x virtual sensor based on structure identification and global optimization,” SAE Technical Paper no. 2005-01-0050, Warrendale, PA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  42. I. Arsie, C. Pianese, and M. Sorrentino,“Recurrent neural networks for AFR estimation and control in spark ignition automotive engines.” Chapter 9 in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nicholas Wickström, Magnus Larsson, Mikael Taveniku, Arne Linde, and Bertil Svensson, “Neural virtual sensors – estimation of combustion quality in SI engines using the spark plug,” in Proc. ICANN 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  44. R.J. Howlett, S.D. Walters, P.A. Howson, and I. Park, “Air–fuel ratio measurement in an internal combustion engine using a neural network,” Advances in Vehicle Control and Safety (International Conference), AVCS’98, Amiens, France, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  45. H. Nareid, M.R. Grimes, and J.R. Verdejo, “A neural network based methodology for virtual sensor development,” SAE Technical Paper no. 2005-01-0045, Warrendale, PA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  46. M.R. Grimes, J.R. Verdejo, and D.M. Bogden, “Development and usage of a virtual mass air flow sensor,” SAE Technical Paper no. 2005-01-0074, Warrendale, PA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  47. W. Thomas Miller III, Richard S. Sutton, and Paul. J. Werbos (eds). Neural Networks for Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  48. K.S. Narendra, “Neural networks for control: theory and practice,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 1385–1406, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. J. Suykens, J. Vandewalle, and B. De Moor. Artificial Neural Networks for Modeling and Control of Non-Linear Systems. Boston: Kluwer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  50. T. Hrycej. Neurocontrol: Towards an Industrial Control Methodology. New York: Wiley, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. Nørgaard, O. Ravn, N.L. Poulsen, and L.K. Hansen. Neural Networks for Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems. London: Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  52. M. Agarwal, “A systematic classification of neural-network-based control,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 75–93, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. R.S. Sutton and A.G. Barto. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  54. P.J. Werbos, “Approximate dynamic programming for real-time control and neural modeling,” in D.A. White and D.A. Sofge (eds), Handbook of Intelligent Control: Neural, Fuzzy, and Adaptive Approaches. New York: Van Nostrand, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  55. R.S. Sutton, A.G. Barto, and R. Williams, “Reinforcement learning is direct adaptive optimal control,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 19–22, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Danil Prokhorov, “Training recurrent neurocontrollers for real-time applications,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1003–1015, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. D. Liu, H. Javaherian, O. Kovalenko, and T. Huang, “Adaptive critic learning techniques for engine torque and air–fuel ratio control,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics, accepted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  58. G.V. Puskorius, L.A. Feldkamp, and L.I. Davis Jr., “Dynamic neural network methods applied to on-vehicle idle speed control,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 1407–1420, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. D. Prokhorov, R.A. Santiago, and D.Wunsch, “Adaptive critic designs: a case study for neurocontrol,” Neural Networks, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1367–1372, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Thaddeus T. Shannon, “Partial, noisy and qualitative models for adaptive critic based neuro-control,” in Proc. of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 1999, Washington, DC, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Pieter Abbeel, Morgan Quigley, and Andrew Y. Ng, “Using inaccurate models in reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-third International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  62. P. He and S. Jagannathan, “Reinforcement learning-based output feedback control of nonlinear systems with input constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 150–154, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Jagannathan Sarangapani. Neural Network Control of Nonlinear Discrete-Time Systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Jay A. Farrell and Marios M. Polycarpou. Adaptive Approximation Based Control. New York: Wiley, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  65. A.J. Calise and R.T. Rysdyk, “Nonlinear adaptive flight control using neural networks,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 14–25, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. J.B. Vance, A. Singh, B.C. Kaul, S. Jagannathan, and J.A. Drallmeier, “Neural network controller development and implementation for spark ignition engines with high EGR levels,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 1083–1100, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. J. Schmidhuber, “A neural network that embeds its own meta-levels,” in Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, San Francisco, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  68. H.T. Siegelmann, B.G. Horne, and C.L. Giles, “Computational capabilities of recurrent NARX neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 208, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. S. Younger, P. Conwell, and N. Cotter, “Fixed-weight on-line learning,” IEEE Transaction on Neural Networks, vol. 10, pp. 272–283, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Sepp Hochreiter, A. Steven Younger, and Peter R. Conwell, “Learning to learn using gradient descent,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN), 21–25 August 2001, pp. 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lee A. Feldkamp, Danil V. Prokhorov, and Timothy M. Feldkamp, “Simple and conditioned adaptive behavior from Kalman filter trained recurrent networks,” Neural Networks, vol. 16, No. 5–6, pp. 683–689, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Ryu Nishimoto and Jun Tani, “Learning to generate combinatorial action sequences utilizing the initial sensitivity of deterministic dynamical systems,” Neural Networks, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 925–933, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. L.A. Feldkamp, G.V. Puskorius, and P.C. Moore, “Adaptation from fixed weight dynamic networks,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1996, pp. 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  74. L.A. Feldkamp, and G.V. Puskorius, “Fixed weight controller for multiple systems,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 2, 1997, pp. 773–778.

    Google Scholar 

  75. D. Prokhorov, “Toward effective combination of off-line and on-line training in ADP framework,” in Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Symposium on Approximate Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning (ADPRL), Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), Honolulu, HI, 1–5 April 2007, pp. 268–271.

    Google Scholar 

  76. P.J. Werbos, “Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 1550–1560, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. R.J. Williams and J. Peng, “An efficient gradient-based algorithm for on-line training of recurrent network trajectories,” Neural Computation, vol. 2, pp. 490–501, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. R.J. Williams and D. Zipser, “A learning algorithm for continually running fully recurrent neural networks,” Neural Computation, vol. 1, pp. 270–280, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. R.J. Williams and D. Zipser, “Gradient-based learning algorithms for recurrent networks and their computational complexity,” in Chauvin and Rumelhart (eds), Backpropagation: Theory, Architectures and Applications. New York: L. Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 433–486.

    Google Scholar 

  80. I. Elhanany and Z. Liu, “A fast and scalable recurrent neural network based on stochastic meta-descent,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, to appear in 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Y. Bengio, P. Simard, and P. Frasconi, “Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 157–166, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. T. Lin, B.G. Horne, P. Tino, and C.L. Giles, “Learning long-term dependencies in NARX recurrent neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 7, no. 6, p. 1329, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long short-term memory,” Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. H.G. Zimmermann, R. Grothmann, A.M. Schfer, and Tietz, “Identification and forecasting of large dynamical systems by dynamical consistent neural networks,” in S. Haykin, J. Principe, T. Sejnowski, and J. Mc Whirter (eds), New Directions in Statistical Signal Processing: From Systems to Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  85. F. Allgöwer and A. Zheng (eds). Nonlinear Model Predictive Control, Progress in systems and Control Theory Series, vol. 26. Basel: Birkhauser, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  86. R. Stengel. Optimal Control and Estimation. New York: Dover, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  87. L.A. Feldkamp and G.V. Puskorius, “Training controllers for robustness: Multi-stream DEKF,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Orlando, 1994, pp. 2377–2382.

    Google Scholar 

  88. N.N. Schraudolph, “Fast curvature matrix-vector products for second-order gradient descent,” Neural Computation, vol. 14, pp. 1723–1738, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. E. Harth, and E. Tzanakou, “Alopex: a stochastic method for determining visual receptive fields,” Vision Research, vol. 14, pp. 1475–1482, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. S. Haykin, Zhe Chen, and S. Becker, “Stochastic correlative learning algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 2200–2209, 2004.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  91. James Kennedy and Yuhui Shi. Swarm Intelligence. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Chia-Feng Juang, “A hybrid of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for recurrent network design,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 997–1006, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Swagatam Das and Ajith Abraham, “Synergy of particle swarm optimization with differential evolution algorithms for intelligent search and optimization,” in Javier Bajo et al. (eds), Proceedings of the Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems Workshop (HAIS06), Salamanca, Spain, 2006, pp. 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Xindi Cai, Nian Zhang, Ganesh K. Venayagamoorthy, and Donald C. Wunsch, “Time series prediction with recurrent neural networks trained by a hybrid PSO-EA algorithm,” Neurocomputing, vol. 70, no. 13–15, pp. 2342–2353, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. J.C. Spall and J.A. Cristion, “A neural network controller for systems with unmodeled dynamics with applications to wastewater treatment,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 369–375, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. S.J. Julier, J.K. Uhlmann, and H.F. Durrant-Whyte, “A new approach for filtering nonlinear systems,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Seattle WA, USA, 1995, pp. 1628–1632.

    Google Scholar 

  97. M. Norgaard, N.K. Poulsen, and O. Ravn, “New developments in state estimation for nonlinear systems,” Automatica, vol. 36, pp. 1627–1638, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  98. I. Arasaratnam, S. Haykin, and R.J. Elliott, “Discrete-time nonlinear filtering algorithms using Gauss–Hermite quadrature,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 95, pp. 953–977, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Eric A. Wan and Rudolph van der Merwe, “The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium 2000 on Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communication and Control (AS-SPCC), Lake Louise, Alberta, Canada, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  100. L.A. Feldkamp, T.M. Feldkamp, and D.V. Prokhorov, “Neural network training with the nprKF,” in Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks ’01, Washington, DC, 2001, pp. 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  101. D. Prokhorov, “Training recurrent neurocontrollers for robustness with derivative-free Kalman filter,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1606–1616, 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  102. H. Jaeger and H. Haas, “Harnessing nonlinearity: predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless telecommunications,” Science, vol. 308, no. 5667, pp. 78–80, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Herbert Jaeger, Wolfgang Maass, and Jose Principe (eds), “Special issue on echo state networks and liquid state machines,” Neural Networks, vol. 20, no. 3, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  104. D. Mandic and J. Chambers. Recurrent Neural Networks for Prediction. New York: Wiley, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  105. J. Kolen and S. Kremer (eds). A Field Guide to Dynamical Recurrent Networks. New York: IEEE, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  106. J. Schmidhuber, D. Wierstra, M. Gagliolo, and F. Gomez, “Training recurrent networks by Evolino,” Neural Computation, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 757–779, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Andrew D. Back and Tianping Chen, “Universal approximation of multiple nonlinear operators by neural networks,” Neural Computation, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 2561–2566, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. R.A. Santiago and G.G. Lendaris, “Context discerning multifunction networks: reformulating fixed weight neural networks,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Budapest, Hungary, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Colin Molter, Utku Salihoglu, and Hugues Bersini, “The road to chaos by hebbian learning in recurrent neural networks,” Neural Computation, vol. 19, no. 1, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Ivan Tyukin, Danil Prokhorov, and Cees van Leeuwen, “Adaptive classification of temporal signals in fixed-weights recurrent neural networks: an existence proof,” Neural Computation, to appear in 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Brian J. Taylor (ed). Methods and Procedures for the Verification and Validation of Artificial Neural Networks. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Laura L. Pullum, Brian J. Taylor, and Marjorie A. Darrah. Guidance for the Verification and Validation of Neural Networks. New York: Wiley-IEEE Computer Society, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  113. M. Vidyasagar, “Statistical learning theory and randomized algorithms for control,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 69–85, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. R.R. Zakrzewski, “Verification of a trained neural network accuracy,” in Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), vol. 3, 2001, pp. 1657–1662.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Tariq Samad, Darren D. Cofer, Vu Ha, and Pam Binns, “High-confidence control: ensuring reliability in high-performance real-time systems,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 315–326, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. J. Schumann and P. Gupta, “Monitoring the performance of a neuro-adaptive controller,” in Proc. MAXENT, American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings 735, 2004, pp. 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  117. R.R. Zakrzewski, “Randomized approach to verification of neural networks,” in Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), vol. 4, 2004, pp. 2819–2824.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Toyota Technical Center - A Division of Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing (TEMA), Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA

    Danil Prokhorov

Authors
  1. Danil Prokhorov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Toyota Technical Center - A Division of Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing (TEMA), Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA

    Danil Prokhorov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prokhorov, D. (2008). Neural Networks in Automotive Applications. In: Prokhorov, D. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Automotive Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 132. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79257-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79257-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79256-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79257-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation