Skip to main content

An Empirically–Based Process to Improve the Practice of Requirement Review

  • Conference paper
Making Globally Distributed Software Development a Success Story (ICSP 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5007))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Requirement quality serves as the basis of the whole software development. How to improve and assure the quality of requirements is one of the most difficult issues. Aiming to improve requirement review in a software company, we propose a role-based requirement review process based on the idea that requirement quality should meet needs of all roles involved to the largest extent, and not only determined by the number of defects found in requirements. This process helps reviewers focus on their own concerns and find more defects related to their tasks, and provides a quantitative method to analyze and evaluate the quality of the requirement document. We also provide a case study to illustrate the new process and report some preliminary results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The Standish Report (2004), http://www.standishgroup.com/chronicles/index.php

  2. Basili, V.R., Green, S., Laitenberger, O., Lanubile, F., Shull, F., Sørumgård, S., Zelkowitz, M.V.: The Empirical Investigation of Perspective Based Reading. Empirical Software Engineering: An International Journal 1(2), 133–164 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. He, L., Carver, J.: PBR vs. Checklist: A Replication in The N-fold Inspection Context. In: 2006 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, pp. 95–104. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gantner, T., Barth, T.: Experiences on Defining and Evaluating An Adapted Review Process. In: The 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 506–511. IEEE Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ormandjieva, O., Hussain, I., Kosseim, L.: Toward A Text Classification System for the Quality Assessment of Software Requirements Written in Natural Language. In: Fourth International Workshop on Software Quality Assurance, pp. 39–45. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. IEEE Standard Association, IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications, IEEE Std-830 (1998), http://standards.ieee.org/reading/ieee/std_public/des-cription/se/830-1998_desc.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Qing Wang Dietmar Pfahl David M. Raffo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, J., Hou, L., Qin, Z., Wang, Q., Chen, G. (2008). An Empirically–Based Process to Improve the Practice of Requirement Review. In: Wang, Q., Pfahl, D., Raffo, D.M. (eds) Making Globally Distributed Software Development a Success Story. ICSP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5007. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79588-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79588-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79587-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79588-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics