Abstract
An autarky is a partial assignment to the variables of a Boolean CNF formula that satisfies every clause containing an assigned variable. For an unsatisfiable formula, an autarky provides information about those clauses that are essentially independent from the infeasibility; clauses satisfied by an autarky are not contained in any minimal unsatisfiable subset (MUS) or minimal correction subset (MCS) of clauses. This suggests a preprocessing step of detecting autarkies and trimming such independent clauses from an instance prior to running an algorithm for finding MUSes or MCSes. With little existing work on algorithms for finding autarkies or experimental evaluations thereof, there is room for further research in this area. Here, we present a novel algorithm that searches for autarkies directly using a standard satisfiability solver. We investigate the autarkies of several industrial benchmark suites, and experimental results show that our algorithm compares favorably to an existing approach for discovering autarkies. Finally, we explore the potential of trimming autarkies in MCS- or MUS-extraction flows.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andraus, Z.S., Liffiton, M.H., Sakallah, K.A.: Refinement strategies for verification methods based on datapath abstraction. In: Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Asia South Pacific design automation (ASP-DAC 2006), pp. 19–24 (2006)
Biere, A., Cimatti, A., Clarke, E.M., Zhu, Y.: Symbolic model checking without BDDs. In: Cleaveland, W.R. (ed.) ETAPS 1999 and TACAS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1579, pp. 193–207. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Birnbaum, E., Lozinskii, E.L.: Consistent subsets of inconsistent systems: structure and behaviour. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 15, 25–46 (2003)
Davis, M., Logemann, G., Loveland, D.: A machine program for theorem-proving. Communications of the ACM 5(7), 394–397 (1962)
Davis, M., Putnam, H.: A computing procedure for quantification theory. Journal of the ACM 7(3), 201–215 (1960)
Dershowitz, N., Hanna, Z., Nadel, A.: A scalable algorithm for minimal unsatisfiable core extraction. In: Sattar, A., Kang, B.-h. (eds.) AI 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4304, pp. 36–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Eén, N., Sörensson, N.: An extensible SAT-solver. In: Giunchiglia, E., Tacchella, A. (eds.) SAT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2919, pp. 502–518. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Grégoire, É., Mazure, B., Piette, C.: Boosting a complete technique to find MSSes and MUSes thanks to a local search oracle. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007), January 2007, vol. 2, pp. 2300–2305 (2007)
Grégoire, É., Mazure, B., Piette, C.: Local-search extraction of MUSes. Constraints 12(3), 325–344 (2007)
Kullmann, O.: Investigations on autark assignments. Discrete Applied Mathematics 107(1-3), 99–137 (2000)
Kullmann, O.: On the use of autarkies for satisfiability decision. In: LICS 2001 Workshop on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT-2001). Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics, vol. 9, pp. 231–253 (2001)
Kullmann, O., Lynce, I., Marques-Silva, J.: Categorisation of clauses in conjunctive normal forms: Minimally unsatisfiable sub-clause-sets and the lean kernel. In: Biere, A., Gomes, C.P. (eds.) SAT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4121, pp. 22–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Liffiton, M.H., Sakallah, K.A.: Algorithms for computing minimal unsatisfiable subsets of constraints. Journal of Automated Reasoning 40(1), 1–33 (2008)
Mneimneh, M.N., Lynce, I., Andraus, Z.S., Silva, J.P.M., Sakallah, K.A.: A branch-and-bound algorithm for extracting smallest minimal unsatisfiable formulas. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds.) SAT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3569, pp. 467–474. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Monien, B., Speckenmeyer, E.: Solving satisfiability in less than 2n steps. Discrete Applied Mathematics 10(3), 287–295 (1985)
Oh, Y., Mneimneh, M.N., Andraus, Z.S., Sakallah, K.A., Markov, I.L.: AMUSE: a minimally-unsatisfiable subformula extractor. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference on Design Automation (DAC 2004), pp. 518–523 (2004)
Safarpour, S., Liffiton, M., Mangassarian, H., Veneris, A., Sakallah, K.: Improved design debugging using maximum satisfiability. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD 2007), November 2007, pp. 13–19 (2007)
Sinz, C.: Towards an optimal CNF encoding of Boolean cardinality constraints. In: van Beek, P. (ed.) CP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3709, pp. 827–831. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Sinz, C., Kaiser, A., Küchlin, W.: Formal methods for the validation of automotive product configuration data. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 17(1), 75–97 (2003)
Van Gelder, A.: Autarky pruning in propositional model elimination reduces failure redundancy. Journal of Automated Reasoning 23(2), 137–193 (1999)
Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Extracting small unsatisfiable cores from unsatisfiable Boolean formula. In: Giunchiglia, E., Tacchella, A. (eds.) SAT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2919, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Liffiton, M., Sakallah, K. (2008). Searching for Autarkies to Trim Unsatisfiable Clause Sets. In: Kleine Büning, H., Zhao, X. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2008. SAT 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4996. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79719-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79719-7_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79718-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79719-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)