Skip to main content

A First Step towards Argument Mining and Its Use in Arguing Agents and ITS

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5177))

Abstract

Argumentation is an interdisciplinary research area that incorporates many fields such as artificial intelligence, multi-agent systems, and collaborative learning. Although different argumentation tools have been developed, a structured data representation format has been missing. Recent researches have focused on applying mining techniques to find meaningful knowledge from these unstructured textual data. This paper reports work in progress on building Relational Argument DataBase(RADB) for argument mining and its use in arguing agents and ITS. The RADB depends on the Argumentation Interchange Format Ontology (AIF) using “Walton Theory” for argument analysis. Our aim is to present a preliminary attempt to support argument construction for agents and/or humans from structured argument database together with different mining techniques. We also discuss the usage of relational argument database in agent-based intelligent tutoring system(ITS) framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Modgil, S., Rahawan, I., Reed, C., Chesnevar, C., McGinnis, J., et al.: Towards an argument interchange format. In: The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 00(0), pp. 1–25. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conrad, J., Schilder, F.: Opinion mining in legal blogs. In: ICAIL 2007, Palo Alto, California USA, June 4-8, 2007, pp. 231–236 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walton, D., Rowe, G., et al.: Araucaria as a tool for diagramming arguments in teaching and studying philosophy. Teaching Philosophy 29, 111–124 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reed, C., Rowe, G., Katzav, J.: Araucaria: Making up argument. In: European Conference on Computing and Philosophy (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Godden, M., Walton, D.: Argument from expert opinion as lgal evidence: Critical questions and admissibility criteria of expert testimony in the american legal system. In: Ratio Juris, vol. 19, pp. 261–286 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zablith, F., Rahawan, I., Reed, C.: The foundation for a world wide argument web. In: Artificial Intelligence Conference (AAAI), April 04 (2007); published in the Artificial Intelligence Journal

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Suthers, D.: Arguing to learn confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments, vol. 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Reed, C., Katzav, J., Rowe, G.: Argument research corpus. In: Huget, M.-P. (ed.) Communication in Multiagent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2650, pp. 269–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boiy, E., Moens, M., Mochales, R., Reed, C.: Automatic detection of arguments in legal texts. In: ICAIL 2007, Palo Alto, California, USA, June 4-8, 2007, pp. 225–230 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Logical systems for defeasible argumentation. In: Gabbay, D., Guenther, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, pp. 219–318. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Srikant, R., Agrawal, R.: Fast algorithms for mining rules. In: Proceeding of the 20th VLDB Conference Santiago, Chile (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rahawan, I., Sakeer, P.V.: Representing and querying arguments on semantic web. In: Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.M. (eds.) Computational Models of Argument. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reed, C., Rowe, G.: Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 13, 983 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Muntz, R.R., Chi, Y., et al.: Frequent subtree mining-an overview. In: Fundamenta Informaticae, pp. 1001–1038 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ignac Lovrek Robert J. Howlett Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abbas, S., Sawamura, H. (2008). A First Step towards Argument Mining and Its Use in Arguing Agents and ITS. In: Lovrek, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85563-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85563-7_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85562-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85563-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics