Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integration of Knowledge in Disjunctive Structure on Semantic Level

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5177))

Abstract

Knowledge integration is a very important task in Knowledge Management field. The aim of this paper is to present an algorithm for knowledge integration based on disjunctive structures. A distance function between disjunctions is analyzed and some postulates for knowledge integration in this logic structure are introduced. Key properties of these postulates and aspects of algorithm are also investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkeson, C., Andrew, M., Stefan, S.: Locally weighted learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11–73 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bock, H.H., Day, W.H.E., McMorris, F.R.: Consensus rules for committee elections. Mathematical Social Sciences 35, 219–232 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Day, W.H.E.: The complexity of computing metric distances between partitions. Mathematical Social Science 1, 269–287 (1981)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Deja, R.: Using Rough Set Theory in Conflicts Analysis, Ph.D. Thesis (Advisor: A. Skowron), Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Diday, E.: Recent Progress in Distance and Similarity Measures in Pattern Recognition. In: Proc. of 2nd International Joint Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 534–539 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Domingos, P.: Rule Induction and Instance-Based Learning: A Unified Approach. In: The 1995 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995), pp. 1226–1232 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grant, J., Hunter, A.: Measuring inconsistency in knowledge bases. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 27(2), 159–184 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hunter, A.: Paraconsistent Logics. In: Gabbay, D., Smets, P. (eds.) Handbook of Defensible Reasoning and Uncertain Information, pp. 13–43. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jung, J.J., Jo, G.S.: Consensus-based Evaluation Framework for Cooperative Information Retrieval Systems. In: Nguyen, N.T., Grzech, A., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES-AMSTA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4496, pp. 169–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Knight, K.: Measuring Inconsistency. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31, 77–98 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kohonen, T.: The Self-Organizing Map. Proceedings of the IEEE 78(9), 1464–1480 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lipski, W., Marek, W.: Combinatorial Analysis. WNT Warsaw (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McMorris, F.R., Mulder, H.M., Powers, R.C.: The median function on median graphs and semilattices. Discrete Appl. Math. 101, 221–230 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen, N.T.: A Method for Integration of Knowledge Using Fuzzy Structure. In: Proc. of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 11–14 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen, N.T.: Using Distance Functions to Solve Representation Choice Problems. Fundamenta Informaticae 48(4), 295–314 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen, N.T.: Advanced Methods for Inconsistent Knowledge Management. Springer, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pawlak, Z.: An Inquiry into Anatomy of Conflicts. Journal of Information Sciences 109, 65–78 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Tran, T.H., Nguyen, N.T.: An Algorithm for Agent Knowledge Integration Using Conjunctive and Disjunctive Structures. In: Nguyen, N.T., Jo, G.S., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES-AMSTA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4953, pp. 703–712. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Information Science and Engineering, Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland

    Trong Hieu Tran & Ngoc Thanh Nguyen

Authors
  1. Trong Hieu Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ngoc Thanh Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Ignac Lovrek Robert J. Howlett Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tran, T.H., Nguyen, N.T. (2008). Integration of Knowledge in Disjunctive Structure on Semantic Level. In: Lovrek, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85563-7_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85563-7_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85562-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85563-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation