Skip to main content

Moving in the Time: An Ontology for Identifying Legal Resources

  • Conference paper
Computable Models of the Law

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4884))

Abstract

The paper presents an application of the FRBROO document model for defining an information ontology of legal resources that takes into account the dimension of time. FRBR-based paradigms are used within several existing projects in computer support of activities in the legal domain, but they are mostly oriented to bibliographic organization of documents without a real modeling of the peculiar characteristics of the legal domain. Also, all of them refer to the current version of the FRBR model, called FRBRER. Yet, in these years the FRBR model is undergoing a major revision and a new version using an object-oriented approach is being developed. Thus we first have updated the model of legal resources to rely on the new object-oriented model, called FRBROO. More importantly, consistency problems were corrected and the time dimension was introduced, which came very useful when considering the legal domain and dealing with legal resources. Therefore, while it is not in the scope of this paper to define an abstract model of the norms (e.g. obligations, permissions, etc.) or the representation of the norms (e.g. rules model), we rather focus our attention on the abstract description of the normative acts lifecycle and how it is possible to fill the gap between the rule modeling and the structure of the legal resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. VV., A.: Studio di fattibilità per la realizzazione del progetto Accesso alle norme in rete. Informatica e Diritto, 1 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Breuker, J., Boer, A., Hoekstra, R., Sartor, G., Rubino, R., Palmirani, M., Gordon, T.F., Wyner, A., Bench-Capon, T.: Deliverable 1.4 of the European Project ESTRELLA - OWL Ontology of Basic Legal Concepts (LKIF-Core). Technical report, University of Amsterdam, Bologna, Liverpool and Fraunhofer FOKUS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carlyle, A.: Ordering author and work records: An evaluation of collocation in online catalog displays. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47, 538–554 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Doerr, M., Hunter, J., Lagoze, C.: Towards a core ontology for information integration. Journal of Digital Information 4(1) (2003-04-09), http://jodi.tamu.edu/Articles/v04/i01/Doerr/doerr-final.pdf

  5. Doerr, M., Le Boeuf, P.: International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonization. FRBR object-oriented definition and mapping to FRBRER (version 0.8.1) (2007), http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/frbr_oo/frbr_docs/FRBR_oo_V0.8.1c.pdf

  6. Fitch, K.: Aleg Data Model. Inventory. AustLit Gateway, http://www.austlit.edu.au:7777/DataModel/inventory.html

  7. Guarino, N.: The role of Identity Conditions in Ontology Design. In: Workshop on Ontology and Problem Solving Methods. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heaney, M.: Time is of the essence: some thoughts occasioned by the papers contributed to the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR. Oxford: Bodleian Library (1997), http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/users/mh/time978a.htm

  9. ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group; CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model: version 4.0, April 2004. Heraklion, Greece (2004), http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/cidoc_crm_version_4.0.pdf

  10. IFLA Study Group on the functional requirements for bibliographic records. Functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report. K. G. Saur, Munich, Germany (1998), http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf

  11. Lima, J.A.O.: An Adaptation of the FRBR Model to Legal Norms. In: Biagioli, C., Francesconi, E., Sartor, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the V Legislative XML Workshop, 2006. European Press Academic Publishing, Italia (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lagoze, C.: Business unusual: how “event-awareness” may breathe life into the catalog? In: Conference on bibliographic control in the new millennium. Washington: Library of Congress, http://lcweb.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/lagoze_paper.html

  13. Leazer, G., Furner, J.: Topological indices of textual identity networks. In: Woods, L. (ed.) Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, pp. 345–358. Information Today, Medford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., OltamariI, A.: Ontology library. IST-2001-33052 Deliverable 18, WonderWeb: Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Palmirani, M.: Dynamics of Norms over Time: a Model for Legislative Consolidation. I Quaderni 18, 42–69 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Palmirani, M.: Modificatory Provisions for Legislative Consolidation, UNDESA Report (2006), http://www.akomantoso.org/resources/modificatory-provisions-for-legislative

  17. Palmirani, M., Sartor, G., Rubino, R., Boer, A., De Maat, E., Vitali, F., Francesconi, E.: Guidelines for applying the new format. Deliverable 3.2, Estrella project, - Guidelines for applying the new format. Technical report, University of Bologna, Amsterdam, CNIPA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. PREMIS, Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata, http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/pmwg/premis-final.pdf

  19. Smiraglia, R.P., Leazer, G.H.: Derivative bibliographic relationships: The work relationship in a global bibliographic database. Journal of the American Society and Information Science 50, 493–504 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smiraglia, R.P.: Further reflections on the nature of ‘A Work’: An introduction. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 33 (3/4), 1–11 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smiraglia, R.P.: The History of “The Work” in the Modern Catalog. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 35(3/4), 553–567 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Svenonius, E.: The intellectual foundation of information organization. Digital libraries and electronic publishing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peters, W., Sagri, M.T., Tiscornia, D.: The structuring of legal knowledge in LOIS. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15(2) (June 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vitali, F.: Akoma Ntoso Release Notes (2007), http://www.akomantoso.org

  25. Yee, M.: What is a work? Part 3: The Anglo-American cataloging codes. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 20(1), 25–46 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Oliveira Lima, J.A., Palmirani, M., Vitali, F. (2008). Moving in the Time: An Ontology for Identifying Legal Resources. In: Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds) Computable Models of the Law. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4884. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85568-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85569-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics