Skip to main content

Combining Lexical Information with Machine Learning for Answer Validation at QA@CLEF 2007

  • Conference paper
Advances in Multilingual and Multimodal Information Retrieval (CLEF 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5152))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 577 Accesses

Abstract

This document contains the description of the experiments carried out by the SINAI group. We have developed an approach based on several lexical measures integrated by means of different machine learning models. Based on lexical features it obtains a 41% of accuracy in answer validation for the Question-Answering task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Di Nunzio, G.M., Ferro, N., Mandl, T., Peters, C.: CLEF 2007 Ad Hoc Track Overview. In: Peters, C., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2007. LNCS, vol. 5152. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrandez., O., Micolo, D., Muñoz, R., Palomar, M.: Técnicas léxico-sintácticas para reconocimiento de implicación textual. Tecnologías de la Información Multilingüe y Multimodal (in press, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Semantic distance in WordNet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang, J.J., Conrath, D.W.: Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Genkin, A., Lewis, D.D., Madigan, D.: BBR: Bayesian logistic regression software. Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, Rutgers University (2005), http://www.stat.rutgers.edu/~madigan/bbr/

  8. Daelemans, W., Zavrel, J., van der Sloot, K., van den Bosch, A.: TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 1.0, Reference Guide. ILK Technical Report (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. García Cumbreras, M.A., Ureña López, A., Martínez Santiago, F.: BRUJA: Question Classification for Spanish. Using Machine Translation and an English Classifier. In: Proceedings of the MLQA 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Carol Peters Valentin Jijkoun Thomas Mandl Henning Müller Douglas W. Oard Anselmo Peñas Vivien Petras Diana Santos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

García-Cumbreras, M.Á., Perea-Ortega, J.M., Martínez-Santiago, F., Ureña-López, L.A. (2008). Combining Lexical Information with Machine Learning for Answer Validation at QA@CLEF 2007. In: Peters, C., et al. Advances in Multilingual and Multimodal Information Retrieval. CLEF 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5152. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85760-0_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85760-0_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85759-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85760-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics