Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence

KI 2008: KI 2008: Advances in Artificial Intelligence pp 364–371Cite as

Simplest Scenario for Mutual Nested Modeling in Human-Machine-Interaction

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5243))

Abstract

The research aim of this paper is to represent everyday-life patterns of thought like “Because I know, what you think I think ...” by a process on a machine, which is involved in an interaction with humans, who also think in such patterns. It analyzes from the perspective of AI the relevant results of such fields as epistemic logic, game theory and psychological investigations of human behavior in strategic interactions. As a result of this interdisciplinary research, a very simple basic interaction scenario and a computer algorithm for managing machine ”thoughts” and behavior are designed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Heuer, A.G., Leopold-Wildburger, U.: Silverman’s Game. Springer, Berlin (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, C., Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M., Wachsmuth, I.: Evaluating affective feedback of the 3d agent max in a competitive cards game. In: Tao, J., Tan, T., Picard, R.W. (eds.) ACII 2005. LNCS, vol. 3784, pp. 466–473. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Billings, D., Burch, N., Davidson, A., Holte, R., Schaeffer, J., Schauenberg, T., Szafron, D.: Approximating game-theoretic optimal strategies for full-scale poker. In: IJCAI 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brazier, F.M.T., Treur, J.: Compositional modelling of reflective agents. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 50(5), 407–431 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fagin, R., Halpern, J., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.: Reasoning about Knowledge. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Camerer, F.C.: Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedden, T., Zhang, J.: What do you think I think you think?: Strategic reasoning in matrix games. Cognition 85(1), 1–36 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A.: Judgement under uncertainty - Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kareev, Y.: Not that bad after all: Generation of random sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Percetion and Performance 18(4), 1189–1194 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mol, L., Verbrugge, R., Hendriks, P.: Learning to reason about other people’s minds. In: Hall, L., Heylen, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Virtual Social Agents. The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (AISB), pp. 191–198 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ono, T., Imai, M.: Reading a robot’s mind: A model of utterance understanding based on the theory of mind mechanism. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Twelfth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 142–148. AAAI Press / The MIT Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prechelt, L.: A motivating example problem for teaching adaptive systems design. SIGCSE Bull. 26(4), 25–34 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stahl, D.O., Wilson, P.W.: Experimental evidence on players’ models of other players. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation 25, 309–327 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tagiew, R.: Gegenseitiges geschachteltes Modellieren in der Interaktion mit einem künstlichen Agenten. Diplomarbeit, Universität Bielefeld (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weber, R.: Behavior and learning in the dirty faces game. Experimental Economics 4(3), 229–242 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Computer Science, Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany

    Rustam Tagiew

Authors
  1. Rustam Tagiew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Andreas R. Dengel Karsten Berns Thomas M. Breuel Frank Bomarius Thomas R. Roth-Berghofer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tagiew, R. (2008). Simplest Scenario for Mutual Nested Modeling in Human-Machine-Interaction. In: Dengel, A.R., Berns, K., Breuel, T.M., Bomarius, F., Roth-Berghofer, T.R. (eds) KI 2008: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5243. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85845-4_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85845-4_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85844-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85845-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation