Skip to main content

Protein Decoy Generation Using Branch and Bound with Efficient Bounding

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 5251))

Abstract

We propose a new discrete protein structure model (using a modified face-centered cubic lattice). A novel branch and bound algorithm for finding global minimum structures in this model is suggested. The objective energy function is very simple as it depends on the predicted half-sphere exposure numbers of C α -atoms. Bounding and branching also exploit predicted secondary structures and expected radius of gyration. The algorithm is fast and is able to generate the decoy set in less than 48 hours on all proteins tested.

Despite the simplicity of the model and the energy function, many of the lowest energy structures, using exact measures, are near the native structures (in terms of RMSD). As expected, when using predicted measures, the fraction of good decoys decreases, but in all cases tested, we obtained structures within 6 Å RMSD in a set of low-energy decoys. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first de novo branch and bound algorithm for protein decoy generation that only depends on such one-dimensional predictable measures. Another important advantage of the branch and bound approach is that the algorithm searches through the entire conformational space. Contrary to search heuristics, like Monte Carlo simulation or tabu search, the problem of escaping local minima is indirectly solved by the branch and bound algorithm when good lower bounds can be obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Backofen, R., Will, S.: A constraint-based approach to fast and exact structure prediction in three-dimensional protein models. Constraints 11(1), 5–30 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Boutonnet, N.S., Kajava, A.V., Rooman, M.J.: Structural classification of alphabetabeta and betabetaalpha supersecondary structure units in proteins. Proteins 30(2), 193–212 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chothia, C., Lesk, A.M.: The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. The EMBO Journal 5, 823–826 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fain, B., Levitt, M.: A novel method for sampling alpha-helical protein backbones. Journal of Molecular Biology 305, 191–201 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamelryck, T.: An amino acid has two sides: a new 2D measure provides a different view of solvent exposure. Proteins 59(1), 38–48 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamelryck, T., Kent, J.T., Krogh, A.: Sampling realistic protein conformations using local structural bias. PLoS Computational Biology 2(9), 1121–1133 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kinjo, A.R., Nishikawa, K.: Recoverable one-dimensional encoding of three-dimensional protein structures. Bioinformatics 21(10), 2167–2170 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolodny, R., Levitt, M.: Protein decoy assembly using short fragments under geometric constraints. Biopolymers 68(3), 278–285 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maranas, C.D., Floudas, C.A.: A deterministic global optimization approach for molecular structure determination. J. Chem. Phys. 100, 1247–1261 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McGuffin, L.J., Bryson, K., Jones, D.T.: The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16, 404–405 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Palu, A.D., Dovier, A., Fogolari, F.: Constraint logic programming approach to protein structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 5(186) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paluszewski, M., Hamelryck, T., Winter, P.: Reconstructing protein structure from solvent exposure using tabu search. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 1 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paluszewski, M., Winter, P.: EBBA: Efficient branch and bound algorithm for protein decoy generation, Department of Computer Science, Univ. of Copenhagen, vol. 08(08) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pollastri, G., Baldi, P., Fariselli, P., Casadio, R.: Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 47(2), 142–153 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Simons, K.T., Kooperberg, C., Huang, E., Baker, D.: Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 268(1), 209–225 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Skolnick, J., Kolinski, A., Ortiz, A.R.: MONSSTER: A method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 265, 217–241 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Standley, D.M., Eyrich, V.A., Felts, A.K., Friesner, R.A., McDermott, A.E.: A branch and bound algorithm for protein structure refinement from sparse nmr data sets. J. Mol. Biol. 285, 1961–1710 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, Z., Jiang, B.: Patterns and conformations of commonly occurring supersecondary structures (basic motifs) in protein data bank. J. Protein Chem. 15(7), 675–690 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vilhjalmsson, B., Hamelryck, T.: Predicting a New Type of Solvent Exposure. In: ECCB, Computational Biology Madrid 2005, P-C35, Poster (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wolsey, L.A.: Integer Programming. Wiley-Interscience, Chichester (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Keith A. Crandall Jens Lagergren

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paluszewski, M., Winter, P. (2008). Protein Decoy Generation Using Branch and Bound with Efficient Bounding. In: Crandall, K.A., Lagergren, J. (eds) Algorithms in Bioinformatics. WABI 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5251. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87361-7_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87361-7_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87360-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87361-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics