Skip to main content

Correspondence Patterns for Ontology Alignment

  • Conference paper
Book cover Knowledge Engineering: Practice and Patterns (EKAW 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5268))

Abstract

We introduce in this paper correspondence patterns as templates to model ontology alignments. Correspondence patterns capture regularities recurring when aligning ontologies. They come in complement of ontology matching algorithms and graphical mapping tools, and facilitate the task of the engineer building the alignment between a pair of ontologies. We develop an ontology mediation framework based on three ontology correspondence abstraction levels. We particularly detail the most abstract level: correspondence patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: A survey of schema-based matching approaches, pp. 146–171 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Euzenat, J., Scharffe, F., Zimmerman, A.: D2.2.10: Expressive alignment language and implementation. Project deliverable 2.2.10, Knowledge Web NoE (FP6-507482) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scharffe, F., Euzenat, J., Ding, Y., Fensel, D.: Correspondence patterns for ontology mediation. In: Proceedings of the Ontology Matching Workshop at ISWC, Busan, Korea. ISWC, CEUR (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klein, M.: Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problems and solutions. In: Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scharffe, F.: Omwg d7: Ontology mapping language. Technical report, Ontology Management Working Group (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rosengard, J.M., Ursu, M.F.: Ontological representations of software patterns. In: Negoita, M.G., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3215, pp. 31–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghidini, C., Serafini, L.: Reconciling concepts and relations in heterogeneous ontologies. In: ESWC, pp. 50–64 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barrasa, J., Corcho, O., Gómez-Pérez, A.: R2o, an extensible and semantically based database-to-ontology mapping language. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases, Toronto, Canada (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns. Addison-Wesley Pub., Reading (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coplien, J.O.: Software Patterns. SIGS Books, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scharffe, F., Euzenat, J., Fensel, D.: Towards correspondence patterns for ontology mediation. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium of Applied Computing, Fortaleza, Brazil. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Staab, S., Erdmann, M., Maedche, A.: Engineering ontologies using semantic patterns. In: O’Leary, A.P.D. (ed.) Proceedings of the IJCAI 2001 Workshop on E-Business & the Intelligent Web, Seattle, WA, USA, August 5, 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blomqvist, E., Sandkuhl, K.: Patterns in ontology engineering: Classification of ontology patterns. In: ICEIS (3), pp. 413–416 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gangemi, A.: Ontology design patterns for semantic web content. In: International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 262–276 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Newell, A.: The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clancey, W.J.: Heuristic classification. Artif. Intell. 27(3), 289–350 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wielinga, B.J., Schreiber, A.T., Breuker, J.A.: Kads: a modelling approach to knowledge engineering. Knowl. Acquis. 4(1), 5–53 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fensel, D., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Crubezy, M., Decker, S., Gaspari, M., Groenboom, R., Grosso, W., van Harmelen, F., Musen, M., Plaza, E., Schreiber, G., Studer, R., Wielinga, B.: The unified problem-solving method development language upml. Knowledge and Information Systems 5(1), 83–131 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bouquet, P., Giunchiglia, F., van Harmelen, F., Serafini, L., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Cowl: Contextualizing ontologies. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 164–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Borgida, A., Serafini, L.: Distributed description logics: Assimilating information from peer sources. Journal of Data Semantics 1, 153–184 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maedche, A., Motik, B., Volz, R., Silva, N.: MAFRA – a mapping framework for distributed ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 235–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Scharffe, F., de Bruijn, J.: A language to specify mappings between ontologies. In: Proc. of the Internet Based Systems IEEE Conference (SITIS 2005) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Euzenat, J.: An API for ontology alignment. In: Proc. 3rd international semantic web conference, Hiroshima (JP), pp. 698–712 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Svab, O.: Exploiting Patterns in Ontology Mapping. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 956–960. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Besana, P., Robertson, D., Rovatsos, M.: Exploiting interaction contexts in p2p ontology mapping. In: P2PKM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. de Bruijn, J., Foxvog, D., Zimmermann, K.: Ontology mediation patterns library v1. Deliverable D4.3.1, SEKT project (IST-2003-506826) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Polleres, A., Scharffe, F., Schindlauer, R.: Sparql++ for mapping between rdf vocabularies. In: ODBASE, On the Move Federated Conferences (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mitra, P., Noy, N.F., Jaiswal, A.R.: Omen: A probabilistic ontology mapping tool. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 537–547. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Aldo Gangemi Jérôme Euzenat

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Scharffe, F., Fensel, D. (2008). Correspondence Patterns for Ontology Alignment. In: Gangemi, A., Euzenat, J. (eds) Knowledge Engineering: Practice and Patterns. EKAW 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5268. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87696-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87696-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87695-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87696-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics