Skip to main content

The Effects of Users’ Background Diagram Knowledge and Task Characteristics upon Information Display Selection

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5223))

Abstract

This paper explores factors associated with effective external representation (ER) use. We describe an information-processing approach to the assessment of ER knowledge. We also present findings from a study that examined the effects of users’ background knowledge of ERs upon performance and their preferences for particular information display forms across a range of database query types that differed in their representational specificity. A representationally specific task is one which can only be performed effectively with one type of representation (or a narrow range of representations). On highly representationally specific tasks, optimal ER selection is crucial. Both ER selection performance and reasoning performance are, in turn, predicted by an individual’s prior knowledge of ERs. On representationally nonspecific tasks, participants performed well with any of several different ER types regardless of their level of prior ER knowledge. It is argued that ER effectiveness crucially depends upon a three-way interaction between user characteristics (e.g. prior knowledge), the cognitive properties of an ER, and task characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pólya, G. (ed.): How to Solve It. Penguin books, London (1945)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cox, R.: Analytical reasoning with external representations. Ph.D thesis, Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grawemeyer, B., Cox, R.: The effect of knowledge-of-external-representations upon performance and representational choice in a database query task. In: [17], pp. 351–354 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Novick, L., Hurley, S.: To matrix, network, or hierarchy, that is the question. Cognitive Psychology 42, 158–216 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox, R., Romero, P., du Boulay, B., Lutz, R.: A cognitive processing perspective on student programmers ’graphicacy’. [17], 344–346

    Google Scholar 

  6. Humphreys, G., Riddoch, M.: Visual object processing: A cognitive neuropsychological approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wehrend, S., Lewis, C.: A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques. In: Proceedings IEEE Visualization, vol. 90, pp. 139–143 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilmore, D.J., Green, T.R.: Comprehension and recall of miniature programs. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 21, 31–48 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vessey, I.: Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sciences 22, 219–241 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng, P.H.: Functional roles for the cognitive analysis of diagrams in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 207–212 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Day, R.S.: Alternative representations. In: Bower, G.H. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 22, pp. 261–305. Academic Press, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Norman, D.A. (ed.): Things that make us smart. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11, 65–100 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonferroni, C.E.: Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilità. Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze 8, 3–62 (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S. (eds.): Applied logistic regression. Wiley and Sons, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell, D.J.: Task complexity: A review and analysis. The Academy of Management Review 13, 40–52 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Blackwell, A.F., Marriott, K., Shimojima, A. (eds.): Diagrams 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2980. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gem Stapleton John Howse John Lee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grawemeyer, B., Cox, R. (2008). The Effects of Users’ Background Diagram Knowledge and Task Characteristics upon Information Display Selection. In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5223. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87730-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87730-1_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87729-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87730-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics