Skip to main content

Complexity and Succinctness Issues for Linear-Time Hybrid Logics

  • Conference paper
Book cover Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5293))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Full linear-time hybrid logic (HL) is a non-elementary and equally expressive extension of standard LTL + past obtained by adding the well-known binder operators ↓ and ∃. We investigate complexity and succinctness issues for HL in terms of the number of variables and nesting depth of binder modalities. First, we present direct automata-theoretic decision procedures for satisfiability and model-checking of HL, which require space of exponential height equal to the nesting depth of binder modalities. The proposed algorithms are proved to be asymptotically optimal by providing matching lower bounds. Second, we show that for the one-variable fragment of HL, the considered problems are elementary and, precisely, Expspace-complete. Finally, we show that for all 0 ≤ h < k, there is a succinctness gap between the fragments HL k and HL h with binder nesting depth at most k and h, respectively, of exponential height equal to k − h.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Areces, C., Blackburn, P., Marx, M.: Hybrid logics: Characterization, interpolation and complexity. J. Symb. Log. 66(3), 977–1010 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bozzelli, L., Lanotte, R.: Complexity and Succinctness issues for linear-time hybrid logics. Technical report (2008), http://dscpi.uninsubria.it/staff/Bozzelli

  3. Blackburn, P., Seligman, J.: What are hybrid languages? In: Kracht, de Rijke, Wansing, Zakharyaschev (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 1, pp. 41–62. CSLI Publications (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buchi, J.R.: On a decision method in restricted second order arithmetic. In: Proc. Internat. Congr. Logic, Method. and Philos. Sci., Stanford, pp. 1–12 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  5. ten Cate, B., Franceschet, M.: On the complexity of hybrid logics with binders. In: Ong, L. (ed.) CSL 2005. LNCS, vol. 3634, pp. 339–354. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Demri, S., Schnoebelen, Ph.: The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics in simple cases. Information and Computation 174(1), 84–103 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Franceschet, M., de Rijke, M.: Model checking hybrid logics (with an application to semistructured data). J. Applied Logic 4(3), 279–304 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Franceschet, M., de Rijke, M., Schlingloff, B.H.: Hybrid logics on linear structures: Expressivity and complexity. In: Proc. 10th TIME, pp. 166–173. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goranko, V.: Hierarchies of modal and temporal logics with reference pointers. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5(1), 1–24 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Miyano, S., Hayashi, T.: Alternating finite automata on ω-words. Theoretical Computer Science 32, 321–330 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of programs. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 46–57 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Safra, S.: On the complexity of omega-automata. In: Proc. 29th FOCS, pp. 319–327 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sistla, A.P., Clarke, E.M.: The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics. Journal of the ACM 32(3), 733–749 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Stockmeyer, L.J.: The complexity of decision problems in automata theory and logic. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering. MIT, Cambridge (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schwentick, T., Weber, V.: Bounded-variable fragments of hybrid logics. In: Thomas, W., Weil, P. (eds.) STACS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4393, pp. 561–572. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Vardi, M.Y.: A temporal fixpoint calculus. In: Proc. 15th Annual POPL, pp. 250–259. ACM Press, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bozzelli, L., Lanotte, R. (2008). Complexity and Succinctness Issues for Linear-Time Hybrid Logics. In: Hölldobler, S., Lutz, C., Wansing, H. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5293. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87803-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87803-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87802-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87803-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics