Skip to main content

Evaluating Learning Algorithms Composed by a Constructive Meta-learning Scheme for a Rule Evaluation Support Method

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 165))

Abstract

The Post-processing of mined patterns such as rules, trees and so forth is one of the key operations in a data mining process. However, it is difficult for human experts to completely evaluate several thousand rules from a large dataset with noise. To reduce the cost of this kind of rule evaluation task, we have developed a rule evaluation support method with rule evaluation models that learn from objective indices for mined classification rules and evaluations by a human expert for each rule.

In this paper, we present an evaluation of the learning algorithms of our rule evaluation support method for the post-processing of mined patterns with rule evaluation models based on objective indices. To enhance the adaptability of these rule evaluation models, we introduced a constructive meta-learning system for the construction of appropriate learning algorithms. We then have performed case studies using the meningitis as an actual problem. Furthermore, we evaluated our method with the eight rule sets obtained from eight UCI datasets. With regard to these results, we show the applicability of the constrictive meta-learning scheme as a learning algorithm selection method for our rule evaluation support method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hilderman, R.J., Hamilton, H.J.: Knowledge Discovery and Measure of Interest. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tan, P.N., Kumar, V., Srivastava, J.: Selecting the Right Interestingness Measure for Association Patterns. In: Proceeding of International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining KDD 2002, pp. 32–41 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yao, Y.Y., Zhong, N.: An Analysis of Quantitative Measures Associated with Rules. In: Proceeding of Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining PAKDD 1999, pp. 479–488 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ohsaki, M., Kitaguchi, S., Kume, S., Yokoi, H., Yamaguchi, T.: Evaluation of Rule Interestingness Measures with a Clinical Dataset on Hepatitis. In: Boulicaut, J.-F., Esposito, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D. (eds.) PKDD 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3202, pp. 362–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Machine Learning 24(2), 123–140 (1996)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: Proc. of Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 148–156 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wolpert, D.: Stacked Generalization. Neural Network 5(2), 241–260 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gama, J., Brazdil, P.: Cascade generalization. Machine Learning 41(3), 315–343 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Metal (2002), http://www.metal-kdd.org/

  10. Bernstein, A., Provost, F.: An intelligent assistant for knowledge discovery process. In: Proceeding IJICAI 2001 Workshop on Wrappers for Performance Enhancement in KDD (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abe, H., Yamaguchi, T.: Constructive Meta-Learning with Machine Learning Method Repositories. In: Orchard, B., Yang, C., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3029, pp. 502–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hatazawa, H., Negishi, N., Suyama, A., Tsumoto, S., Yamaguchi, T.: Knowledge Discovery Support from a Meningoencephalitis Database Using an Automatic Composition Tool for Inductive Applications. In: Proc. of KDD Challenge, in conjunction with PAKDD 2000, pp. 28–33 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hettich, S., Blake, C.L., Merz, C.J.: UCI Repository of machine learning databases, Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine (1998), http://www.ics.uci.edu/mlearn/MLRepository.html

  14. Fayyad, U.M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., Uthurusamy, R. (eds.): Explora: A Multipattern and Multistrategy Discovery Assistant. In: Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 249–271. AAAI/MIT Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ali, K., Manganaris, S., Srikant, R.: Partial classification using association rules. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining KDD 1997, pp. 115–118 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brin, S., Motwani, R., Ullman, J., Tsur, S.: Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. In: Proc. of ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pp. 255–264 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rijsbergen, C.: Information Retrieval, Ch. 7, Butterworths, London (1979), http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/Keith/Chapter.7/Ch.7.html

  18. Gray, B., Orlowska, M.E.: CCAIIA: Clustering Categorical Attributes into Interesting Association Rules. In: Pacific-Asia Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining PAKDD 1998, pp. 132–143 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hamilton, H.J., Shan, N., Ziarko, W.: Machine Learning of Credible Classifications. In: Proc. of Australian Conf. on Artificial Intelligence AI 1997, pp. 330–339 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goodman, L.A., Kruskal, W.H.: Measures of association for cross classifications. Springer Series in Statistics, vol. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Smyth, P., Goodman, R.M.: Rule Induction using Information Theory. In: Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Frawley, W.J. (eds.) Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 159–176. AAAI/MIT Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Piatetsky-Shapiro, G.: Discovery, Analysis and Presentation of Strong Rules. In: Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Frawley, W.J. (eds.) Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 229–248. AAAI/MIT Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gago, P., Bento, C.: A Metric for Selection of the Most Promising Rules. In: European Conference on the Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery PKDD 1998, pp. 19–27 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhong, N., Yao, Y.Y., Ohshima, M.: Peculiarity Oriented Multi-Database Mining. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(4), 952–960 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: DataMining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quinlan, J.R.: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hinton, G.E.: Learning distributed representations of concepts. In: Proceedings of 8th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Platt, J.: Fast Training of Support Vector Machines using Sequential Minimal Optimization. In: Schölkopf, B., Burges, C., Smola, A. (eds.) Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, pp. 185–208. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Frank, E., Wang, Y., Inglis, S., Holmes, G., Witten, I.H.: Using model trees for classification. Machine Learning 32(1), 63–76 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. R.C.H.: Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Machine Learning 11, 63–91 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mitchell, T.M.: Generalization as Search. Artificial Intelligence 18(2), 203–226 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Michalski, R., Mozetic, I., Hong, J., Lavrac, N.: The AQ15 Inductive Learning System: An Over View and Experiments, Reports of Machine Learning and Inference Laboratory, No.MLI-86-6, George Mason University (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Booker, L.B., Holland, J.H., Goldberg, D.E.: Classifier Systems and Genetic Algorithms. Artificail Inteligence 40, 235–282 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of Decision Tree. Machine Learning 1, 81–106 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Frank, E., Witten, I.H.: Generating accurate rule sets without global optimization. In: Proc. of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 144–151 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abe, H., Tsumoto, S., Ohsaki, M., Yamaguchi, T. (2009). Evaluating Learning Algorithms Composed by a Constructive Meta-learning Scheme for a Rule Evaluation Support Method. In: Zighed, D.A., Tsumoto, S., Ras, Z.W., Hacid, H. (eds) Mining Complex Data. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 165. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88067-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88067-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88066-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88067-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics