Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cause of death among women and the most effective method for its diagnosis is mammography. However, this kind of analysis is very difficult to interpret and for this reason radiologists miss 20-30% of tumors. We propose a module for the segmentation of masses that can be implemented in a complete CADx (Computer Aided Diagnosis) system. In particular, we implement a new version of the region growing algorithm specific for this kind of images and for the constraints on computation time of this application.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bankman, I.N., Nizialek, T., Simon, I., Gatewood, O.B., Weinberg, I.N., Brody, W.R.: Algorithms for segmenting small low-contrast objects in images. In: Recent advances in breast imaging, mammography, and computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer, pp. 723–738. SPIE Press, Bellingham (2006)
Correia, P., Pereira, F.: Objective evaluation of relative segmentation quality. In: Proceedings of 2000 International Conference on Image Processing, 2000, vol. 1, pp. 308–311 (2000)
Dinnes, J., Moss, S., Melia, J., et al.: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: Findings of a systematic review. The Breast 10, 455–463 (2001)
Heath, M., Bowyer, K.W., Kopans, D., Moore, R., Kegelmeyer, P.: Current status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography. In: Digital Mammography, pp. 457–460. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)
Kobatake, H., Murakami, M., Takeo, H., Nawano, S.: Computerized detection of malignant tumors on digital mammograms. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18(5), 369–378 (1999)
Li, H.D., Kallergi, M., Clarke, M., Jain, L.P., Clark, V.K.: Markov random field for tumor detection in digital mammography. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 14(3), 565–576 (1995)
Matsubara, T., Fujita, H., Endo, T., et al.: Development of mass detection algorithm based on adaptive thresholding technique in digital mammograms. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 391–396. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1996)
Mencattini, A., Salmeri, M., Lojacono, R., Frigerio, M., Caselli, F.: Mammographic images enhancement and denoising for detection of tumoral signs using dyadic wavelet processing. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 57(5) (in press)
Mencattini, A., Salmeri, M., Lojacono, R., Rabottino, G., Romano, S.: Mammographic image analysis for tumoral mass automatic classification. In: EFOMP European Conference on Medical Physics (EFOMP 2007), Castelvecchio Pascoli, Italy (September 2007)
Polakowski, W.E., Cournoyer, D.A., Rogers, S.K., et al.: Computer-aided reast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16(6) (1997)
Serra, J.: Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Academic Press, New York (1982)
Zwiggelaara, R., Parra, T.C., Schumma, J.E., et al.: Model-based detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms. Medical Image Analysis 3(1), 39–62 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mencattini, A., Rabottino, G., Salmeri, M., Lojacono, R., Colini, E. (2008). Breast Mass Segmentation in Mammographic Images by an Effective Region Growing Algorithm. In: Blanc-Talon, J., Bourennane, S., Philips, W., Popescu, D., Scheunders, P. (eds) Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems. ACIVS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5259. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88458-3_86
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88458-3_86
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88457-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88458-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)