Abstract
Logical inconsistency may often occur throughout the development stage of a DL-based ontology. We apply the lexicographic inference to reason over inconsistent DL-based ontologies without repairing them first. We address the problem of checking consequences in a \(\mathcal{SHIQ}\) ontology that are classically inferred from every consistent (or coherent) subontology having the highest lexicographic precedence. We propose a method for compiling a \(\mathcal{SHIQ}\) ontology to a propositional program so that the problem can be solved in polynomial calls to a SAT solver. We prove that this time complexity is worst-case optimal in data complexity. In order to make the method more scalable, we also present partition-based techniques to optimize the calling of SAT solvers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H., Lynch, C., Snyder, W.: Basic paramodulation. Information and Computation 121(2), 172–192 (1995)
Benferhat, S., Cayrol, C., Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entailment. In: Proc. of IJCAI 1993, pp. 640–647 (1993)
Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: How to infer from inconsisent beliefs without revising? In: Proc. of IJCAI 1995, pp. 1449–1457 (1995)
Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: On the complexity of non-monotonic entailment in syntax-based approaches. In: Proc. of ECAI 1994 Workshop on Algorithms, Complexity and Commonsense Reasoning (1994)
Du, J., Qi, G., Shen, Y.: Lexicographical inference over inconsistent DL-based ontologies. Technical report, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (May 2008), http://lcs.ios.ac.cn/~jfdu/papers/lexinf-tr.pdf
Du, J., Shen, Y.: Computing minimum cost diagnoses to repair populated DL-based ontologies. In: Proc. of WWW 2008, pp. 565–574 (2008)
Eén, N., Sörensson, N.: Translating pseudo-boolean constraints into SAT. JSAT 2, 1–26 (2006)
Eiter, T., Gottlob, G., Mannila, H.: Disjunctive datalog. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 22(3), 364–418 (1997)
Fitting, M.: First-order Logic and Automated Theorem Proving, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1996)
Haase, P., van Harmelen, F., Huang, Z., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sure, Y.: A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 353–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tobies, S.: Practical reasoning for very expressive description logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL 8(3) (2000)
Huang, Z., van Harmelen, F., ten Teije, A.: Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2005, pp. 454–459 (2005)
Hustadt, U., Motik, B., Sattler, U.: Reasoning in description logics by a reduction to disjunctive datalog. Journal of Automated Reasoning 39(3), 351–384 (2007)
Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Grau, B.C.: Repairing unsatisfiable concepts in OWL ontologies. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 170–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Krentel, M.W.: The complexity of optimization problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 36(3), 490–509 (1988)
Lembo, D., Ruzzi, M.: Consistent query answering over description logic ontologies. In: Marchiori, M., Pan, J.Z., de Sainte Marie, C. (eds.) RR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4524, pp. 194–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Ma, Y., Hitzler, P., Lin, Z.: Algorithms for paraconsistent reasoning with OWL. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, pp. 399–413. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Meyer, T., Lee, K., Booth, R.: Knowledge integration for description logics. In: Proc. of AAAI 2005, pp. 645–650 (2005)
Motik, B.: Reasoning in Description Logics using Resolution and Deductive Databases. PhD thesis, Univesität karlsruhe, Germany (January 2006)
Nieuwenhuis, R., Rubio, A.: Theorem proving with ordering and equality constrained clauses. Journal of Symbolic Computation 19(4), 321–351 (1995)
Odintsov, S.P., Wansing, H.: Inconsistency-tolerant Description Logic: Motivation and Basic Systems. In: Trends in Logic: 50 Years of Studia Logica, pp. 301–335. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)
Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Kalyanpur, A.: Debugging OWL ontologies. In: Proc. of WWW 2005, pp. 633–640 (2005)
Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/
Plaisted, D.A., Greenbaum, S.: A structure-preserving clause form translation. Journal of Symbolic Computation 2(3), 293–304 (1986)
Qi, G., Liu, W., Bell, D.: A revision-based approach to handling inconsistency in description logics. Artificial Intelligence Review 26(1-2), 115–128 (2006)
Qi, G., Pan, J.Z., Ji, Q.: Extending description logics with uncertainty reasoning in possibilistic logic. In: Mellouli, K. (ed.) ECSQARU 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4724, pp. 828–839. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Schlobach, S.: Diagnosing terminologies. In: Proc. of AAAI 2005, pp. 670–675 (2005)
Schlobach, S., Cornet, R.: Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2003, pp. 355–362 (2003)
Sheini, H.M., Sakallah, K.A.: Pueblo: A hybrid pseudo-boolean SAT solver. JSAT 2, 157–181 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Du, J., Qi, G., Shen, YD. (2008). Lexicographical Inference over Inconsistent DL-Based Ontologies. In: Calvanese, D., Lausen, G. (eds) Web Reasoning and Rule Systems. RR 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5341. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88737-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88737-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88736-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88737-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)