Skip to main content

SBVR Use Cases

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5321))

Abstract

Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Rules (SBVR) is a new standard from the OMG that combines aspects of ontologies and of rule systems. This paper summarizes SBVR, reviews some possible use cases for SBVR, and discusses ways that vocabularies and rules given in SBVR could relate to established ontology standards, to rules technologies, and to other IT implementation technologies. It also describes experience with an SBVR prototype that transforms a subset of SBVR rules types to several types of runtime implementations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Object Modeling Group (OMG): Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules Specification, Version 1.0 (2007), http://www.omg.org/spec/SBVR/1.0/

  2. Halpin, T.: Business Rule Modality. In: EMMSAD 2006, the Eleventh International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design, Luxembourg (2006), http://www.orm.net/pdf/RuleModality.pdf , http://emmsad06.idi.ntnu.no/EMMSAD06_p3-halpin.pdf

  3. Ross, R.: Business Rule Concepts, 2nd edn. Business Rule Solutions, LLC (2005), http://www.brsolutions.com/b_concepts.php , ISBN -941049-06-X

  4. Business Rules Community (1997-2007), http://www.brcommunity.com/

  5. Chapin, D.: Semantics of Business Vocabulary & Business Rules. In: The W3C Workshop on Rule Languages for Interoperability (2005), http://www.w3.org/2004/12/rules-ws/slides/donaldchapin.pdf , http://www.w3.org/2004/12/rules-ws/paper/85/

  6. Chapin, D., Hall, J.: Developing Business Models with SBVR and the BMM. In: The 6th European Business Rules Conference (Dusseldorf 2007) (2007), http://www.eurobizrules.org/Uploads/Files/Chapin_20tutorial.pdf

  7. Linehan, M.: Semantics in Model-Driven Business Design. In: SWPW 2006, the 2nd International Semantic Web Policy Workshop, Athens, GA (2006), http://www.l3s.de/~olmedilla/events/2006/SWPW06/programme/paper_02.pdf

  8. Linehan, M.: Ontologies and Rules in Business Models. In: VORTE 2007, the 3rd International Workshop on Vocabularies, Ontologies and Rules for The Enterprise, Annapolis, MD (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchs, N.E., Schwitter, R.: Attempto Controlled English (ACE). In: CLAW 1996, First International Workshop on Controlled Language Applications. University of Leuven, Belgium (1996), http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/attempto/description/index

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bernstein, A., Kaufmann, E.: GINO - A Guided Input Natural Language Editor. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273. Springer, Heidelberg (2006), http://iswc2006.semanticweb.org/items/Bernstein2006tg.pdf

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Sowa, J.: Common Logic Controlled English, http://www.jfsowa.com/clce/specs.htm

  12. GAO, Financial Management Systems – Additional Efforts Needed to Address Key Causes of Modernization Failures. United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO-06-184 (2006), http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-06-184

  13. Altwarg, R.: Controlled Languages, an Introduction. Centre for Language Technology website on Controlled Natural Languages, Macquarie University (2006), http://www.shlrc.mq.edu.au/masters/students/raltwarg/clwhatisa.htm

  14. Miller, J., Mukerji, J.: MDA Guide Version 1.0.1 (2003); Published by the Object Modeling Group at, http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf

  15. Object Modeling Group (OMG), Production Rules Representation, Draft Adopted Specification (2007), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?bmi/07-08-01

  16. Boley, H., Tabet, S., Wagner, G.: Design Rationale of RuleML: A Markup Language for Semantic Web Rules. In: Proceedings of the Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS 2001), Stanford, pp. 381–401 (2001), http://www.ruleml.org/

  17. Welty, C., de Sainte Marie, C.: Rule Interchange Format (RIF). World Wide Web Consortium working group report (2006), http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/

  18. Warmer, J., Kleppe, A.: The Object Constraint Language: Getting Your Models Ready for MDA, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. A-Most., 4th Workshop on Advances in Model Based Testing (2008), http://kimba.mat.ucm.es/AMOST08/

  20. Nayak, N., et al.: Core Business Architecture for a Service-oriented Enterprise. IBM Systems Journal 46(2) (2007), http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/464/nayak.pdf

  21. ADM. Architecture Driven Modernization task force at the Object Management Group (OMG), http://adm.omg.org/

  22. Object Modeling Group (OMG), Knowledge Discovery Metamodel, Draft Adopted Specification (2007), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2007-03-15

  23. Putrycz, E., Kark, A.: Recovering Business Rules from Legacy Source Code for System Modernization. In: Paschke, A., Biletskiy, Y. (eds.) RuleML 2007. LNCS, vol. 4824. Springer, Heidelberg (2007), http://2007.ruleml.org/docs/erik%20putrycz%20-%20RuleML%202007.pdf

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumaran, S.: Model Driven Enterprise. Proceedings of Global Integration Summit, Banff, Canada (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. IBM WebSphere. IBM WebSphere Business Modeler, http://www-306.ibm.com/software/integration/wbimodeler

  26. IBM WebSphere. IBM WebSphere Process Server, http://www-306.ibm.com/software/integration/wps/

  27. Høydalsvik, G.M., Sindre, G.: On the purpose of object-oriented analysis. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 28(10), 240–255 (1993), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.47.9939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Goedertier, S., Mues, C., Vanthienen, J.: Specifying Process-Aware Access Control Rules in SBVR. In: Paschke, A., Biletskiy, Y. (eds.) RuleML 2007. LNCS, vol. 4824, pp. 39–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Linehan, M.H. (2008). SBVR Use Cases. In: Bassiliades, N., Governatori, G., Paschke, A. (eds) Rule Representation, Interchange and Reasoning on the Web. RuleML 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5321. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88808-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88808-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88807-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88808-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics