In order to realize the semantic web vision, the creation of semantic annotation, the linking of web pages to ontologies, and the creation, evolution and interrelation of ontologies must become automatic or semi-automatic processes. Natural Language Generation (NLG) takes structured data in a knowledge base as input and produces natural language text, tailored to the presentational context and the target reader. NLG techniques use and build models of the context and the user and use them to select appropriate presentation strategies.
In the context of Semantic Web or knowledge management, NLG can be applied to provide automated documentation of ontologies and knowledge bases. Unlike human-written texts, an automatic approach will constantly keep the text up-to-date which is vitally important in the Semantic Web context where knowledge is dynamic and is updated frequently. This chapter presents several Natural Language Generation (NLG) techniques that produce textual summaries from Semantic Web ontologies. The main contribution is in showing how existing NLG tools can be adapted to take Semantic Web ontologies as their input, in a way which minimizes the customization effort.
A major factor in the quality of the generated text is the content of the ontology itself. For instance, the use of string datatype properties with implicit semantics leads to the generation of text with missing semantic information. Three approaches to overcome this problem are presented and users can choose the one that suits their application best.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Carroll JD, Arabie P (1980) Multidimensional scaling. In M.R. Rosenzweig and L.W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, 31: 607–649
Deerwester S, Dumais S, Furnas G, Landuer T, Harshman R (1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science 41(6): 391–407
Fortuna B, Mladenić D, Grobelnik M (2006) Visualization of text document corpus. Informatica 29: 497–502
Grobelnik M, Brank J, Mladenić D, Novak B, Fortuna B (2006) Using DMoz for constructing ontology from data stream. International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces,Croatia
Grobelnik M, Mladenić D (2008) Text Garden, Springer
Havre S, Hetzler B, Nowell L (2000) ThemeRiver: Visualizing theme changes over time. Information Visualization, 2000, IEEE Symposium on, pages 115–123, Salt Lake City http:// docatlas.ijs.si http://www.textmining.net
Jain AK, Murty MN, Flynn PJ (1999) Data Clustering: A Review, ACM Computing Survey
Lewis DD, Yang Y, Rose T, Li F (2004) RCV1: A new benchmark collection for text categorization research. Journal of Machine Learning Research 5: 361–397
Salton G (1991) Developments in automatic text retrieval. Science 253: 974–979
Wang X, McCallum A (2006) Topics over time: A non-Markov continuous-time model of topical trends. Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 424–433, Philadelphia
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fortuna, B., Mladenić, D., Grobelnik, M. (2009). Visualization of Temporal Semantic Spaces. In: Davies, J., Grobelnik, M., Mladenić, D. (eds) Semantic Knowledge Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88845-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88845-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88844-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88845-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)