Skip to main content

Weighted Ontology for Semantic Search

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5332))

Abstract

This paper presents a method, SemSim, for the semantic search and retrieval of digital resources (DRs) that have been previously annotated. The annotation is performed by using a set of characterizing concepts, referred to as features, selected from a reference ontology. The proposed semantic search method requires that the features in the ontology are weighted. The weight represents the probability that a resource is annotated with the associated feature. The SemSim method operates in three stages. In the first stage, the similarity between concepts (consim) is computed by using their weights. In the second stage, the concept weights are used to derive the semantic similarity (semsim) between a user request and the DRs. In the last stage, the answer is returned in the form of a ranked list. An experiment aimed at assessing the proposed method and a comparison against a few among the most popular competing solutions is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alani, H., Brewster, C.: Ontology ranking based on the Analysis of Concept Structures. In: K-CAP 2005, Banff, Alberta, Canada (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castano, S., De Antonellis, V., Fugini, M.G., Pernici, B.: Conceptual Schema Analysis: Techniques and Applications. ACM Transactions on Databases Systems 23(3), 286–333 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cordì, V., Lombardi, P., Martelli, M., Mascardi, V.: An Ontology-Based Similarity between Sets of Concepts. In: Proceeding of WOA 2005, pp. 16–21 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. DSTC, IBM, Sandpiper Software; Ontology Definition Metamodel, Revised submission to OMG (2005), http://www.omg.org/docs/ad/05-01-01.pdf

  5. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fang, W.-D., Zhang, L., Wang, Y.-X., Dong, S.-B.: Towards a Semantic Search Engine Based on Ontologies. In: Proc. of 4th Int’l Conference on Machine Learning, Guangzhou (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Formica, A.: Concept similarity by evaluating Information Contents and Feature Vectors: a combined approach. Communications of the ACM (CACM) (to appear, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Formica, A., Missikoff, M.: Concept Similarity in SymOntos: an Enterprise Ontology Management Tool. Computer Journal 45(6), 583–594 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Frakes, W.B., Baeza-Yates, R.: Information Retrieval, Data Structure and Algorithms. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaccard, P.: Bulletin del la Société Vaudoise des Sciences. Naturelles 37, 241–272 (1901)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kasahara, K., Matsuzawa, K., Ishikawa, T., Kawaoka, T.: Viewpoint-Based Measurement of Semantic Similarity between Words. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 292–302. Fort Lauderdale (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, J.W., Candan, K.S.: CP/CV: Concept Similarity Mining without Frequency Information from Domain Describing Taxonomies. In: Proc. of CIKM 2006 Conference (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, Y., Bandar, Z.A., McLean, D.: An Approach fro Measuring Semantic Similarity between Words Using Multiple Information Sources. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(4), 871–882 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, D.: An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity. In: Shavlik, J.W. (ed.) Proc. of 15th the International Conference on Machine Learning, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 296–304. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maarek, Y.S., Berry, D.M., Kaiser, G.E.: An Information Retrieval Approach For Automatically Constructing Software Libraries. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 17(8), 800–813 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Madhavan, J., Halevy, A.Y.: Composing Mappings among Data Sources. In: VLDB 2003, pp. 572–583 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maguitman, A.G., Menczer, F., Roinestad, H., Vespignani, A.: Algorithmic Detection of Semantic Similarity. In: Proc. of WWW 2005 Conference, Chiba, Japan (May 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, G.A., Charles, W.G.: Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes 6(1), 1–28 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Munkres, J.: Algorithms for the Assignment and Transportation Problems. Journal of the Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics 5(1), 32–38 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Rada, L., Mili, V., Bicknell, E., Bletter, M.: Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Transaction on systems. Man, and Cybernetics 19(1), 17–30 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: Proc. of IJCAI (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shannon, C.E.: A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423, 623–656 (1948)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Velardi, P., et al.: TermExtractor: a Web Application to Learn the Common Terminology of Interest Groups and Research Communities. In: 9th Conf. on Terminology and Artificial Intelligence TIA 2007, Sophia Antinopolis (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Velardi, P., Navigli, R., Cuchiarelli, A., Neri, F.: Evaluation of ontolearn, a methodology for automatic population of domain ontologies. In: Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Magnini, B. (eds.) Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verb semantics and lexicon selection. In: The 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Las Cruces, New, Mexico, pp. 133–138 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Formica, A., Missikoff, M., Pourabbas, E., Taglino, F. (2008). Weighted Ontology for Semantic Search. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008. OTM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5332. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88873-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88873-4_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88872-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88873-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics