Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5333))

Abstract

The technical challenges associated with the development and deployment of ontologies have been subject to a number of research initiatives since the beginning of the nineties. By comparison the economics of ontology engineering remains a poorly exploited field, this underdevelopment having an impact on the adoption of ontology-driven technologies beyond the boundaries of the academic community. The work presented in this paper aims at the alleviation of this situation. We introduce a method for measuring the benefits of ontologies based on a multiple gap model for user information satisfaction analysis. Together with cost models such as ONTOCOM, it can be used to give an account of the economic value of ontologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, S., Reid, S.: Evaluation of an ontology-based information retrieval tool. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andresen, J.: How to select an it evaluation method – in the context of construction. In: Proceedings of the CIB w78 conference, Aarhus School of Architecture (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andresen, J., Baldwin, A., Betts, M., Carter, C., Hamilton, A., Stokes, E., Thorpe, T.: A framework for measuring it innovation benefits. ITcon (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bontas, E.P., Tempich, C.: Ontology engineering: A reality check. In: Proceedings of ODBASE 2006, pp. 836–854 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cardoso, J.: The semantic web vision: Where are we? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22–26 (September/October 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carter, C., Thorpe, T., Baldwin, A.: Benefits assessment. ISoCCCrates Deliverable 3, University of Loughborough (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Castells, P., Fernández, M., Vallet, D.: An adaptation of the vector-space model for ontology-based information retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19(2), 261–272 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cyert, R.M., March, J.G.: Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gruninger, M., Lee, J.: Introduction – ontology: different ways of representing the same concept. Commun. ACM 45(2), 39–41 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hepp, M.: Ontologies: State of the Art, Business Potential, and Grand Challenges. In: Ontology Management: Semantic Web, Semantic Web Services, and Business Applications, pp. 3–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keen, P.: Value analysis: Justifying decision support systems. MIS Quarterly 5(1), 1–15 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, K.K.: User satisfaction: A synthesis of three different perspectives. The journal of information systems 4(1), 1–12 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, K.K.: User information satisfaction: toward conceptual clarity. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 183–191 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leger, A., Nixon, L., Shvaiko, P.: On identifying knowledge processing requirements. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 928–943. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, J., Doyle, B.: Measuring the effectiveness of computer-based information systems in the fincancial services sector. MIS Quarterly 11(1) (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oberle, D.: Semantic Management of Middleware (Semantic Web and Beyond: Computing for Human Experience). Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. OntoWeb European Project. Ontology-based information exchange for knowledge management and electronic commerce (ontoweb deliverable 2.4) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parker, M.M., Benson, R.J.: Information Economics - Linking business performance to information technology (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parker, M., Benson, R., Trainor, E.: Information Economics: Linking Business Performance and Information Technology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paslaru Bontas, E.: A Contextual Approach to Ontology Reuse: Methodology, Methods and Tools for the Semantic Web. PhD thesis, Free University of Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paslaru-Bontas-Simperl, E., Tempich, C., Sure, Y.: Ontocom: A cost estimation model for ontology engineering. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Porter, M.: Competitive Advantage. The Free Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Powell, P.: Evaluation of Information Technology Investments: Business as Usual? In: Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox, pp. 151–182. Wiley, Chichester (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Remenyi, D., Money, A., Twite, A.: The effective measurement and management of IT costs and benefits. Butterworth-Heinemann (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rockart, J.: Chief executives defines their own data needs. Harvard Business Review, 1–13 (March-April 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  26. SWAD European Project. Semantic Web applications - analysis and selection (Deliverable SWAD EU-IST-2001-34732) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bürger, T., Simperl, E. (2008). Measuring the Benefits of Ontologies. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008 Workshops. OTM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5333. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_82

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88874-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88875-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics