Skip to main content

A Formal Semantics-Preserving Translation from Fuzzy Relational Database Schema to Fuzzy OWL DL Ontology

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5367))

Abstract

How to construct Web ontologies has become a key technology to enable the Semantic Web, especially how to construct ontologies by extracting domain knowledge from database models such as the relational database model. But in real-world applications, information is often imprecise and uncertain, thus the formal approach to translation from Fuzzy Relational Database Schema (FRDBS) to fuzzy ontology is helpful for extracting domain knowledge from database, which can profitably support fuzzy ontology development and developing data-intensive Semantic Web applications. In this paper, we first give the formal definition of FRDBS. Then, the formal definition and Model-Theoretic semantics of a kind of new fuzzy OWL DL ontology are given in more detail. What’s more, we realize the formal translation from FRDBS to fuzzy OWL DL ontology by means of reverse engineering technique. Of course, the correctness of translation is also proved. With an example, it shows that the translation method is semantics-preserving and effective. Finally, the reasoning problem of satisfiability, subsumption, and redundancy of FRDBS may reason automatically through reasoning mechanism of the corresponding fuzzy description logic f-SHOIN(D) of fuzzy OWL DL ontology is also investigated, which can further contribute to constructing fuzzy OWL DL ontologies exactly that meet application’s needs well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. An, Y., Borgida, A., Mylopoulos, J.: Refining Semantic Mappings from Relational Tables to Ontologies. In: Bussler, C.J., Tannen, V., Fundulaki, I. (eds.) SWDB 2004. LNCS, vol. 3372, pp. 84–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5), 34–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, P.P.: The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Systems 1(1), 9–36 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Calvanese, D., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D.: Unifying class-based representation formalisms. J. Artificial Intelligence Research 11(2), 199–240 (1999)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ceravolo, P., Corallo, A., Damiani, E., Elia, G., Viviani, M., Zilli, A.: Bottom-up Extraction and Maintenance of Ontology-based Metadata. In: Sanchez, E. (ed.) Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web, pp. 265–282. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Calegari, S., Ciucci, D.: Fuzzy ontology, fuzzy description logics and fuzzy-OWL. In: Masulli, F., Mitra, S., Pasi, G. (eds.) WILF 2007. LNCS, vol. 4578, pp. 118–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Juric, D., Skočir, Z.: Building OWL ontologies by analyzing relational database schema concepts and WordNet semantic relations. In: Juric, D., Skočir, Z. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th Int. Conference on Telecommunications, ConTEL, Zagreb, Croatia, pp. 235–242 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dean, M., Schreiber, G. (eds.): OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C Recommendation, 10 Feb (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/

  9. Fensel, D., Pérez, A. (eds.): A Survey on Ontology Tools. IST Project OntoWeb Deliverable 1.3 (May 2002), ontoweb.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/About/Deliverables/D13_v1-0.zip

  10. Jesus, L., P-de., S.P.: Selection of Reverse Engineering Methods for Relational Databases. In: Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, pp. 194–197 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kashyap, V.: Design and creation of ontologies for environmental information retrieval. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ma, Z.M.: A conceptual design methodology for fuzzy relational databases. Journal of Database Management 16(2), 66–83 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ma, Z.M., Zhang, W.J., Ma, W.Y.: Extending object-oriented databases for fuzzy information modeling. Information Systems 29(5), 421–435 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Medina, J.M., Pons, O., Vila, M.A.: GEFRED: a generalized model of fuzzy relational databases. Information Sciences 76, 87–109 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. OWL: Ontology Web Language, http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/

  16. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I. (eds.): OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation (Feburary 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-semantics-20040210/

  17. Parry, D.: Fuzzy ontologies for information retrieval on the WWW. In: Sanchez, E. (ed.) Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Straccia, U.: Towards a fuzzy description logic for the semantic Web. In: Proc. of the 2nd European Semantic Web Conf. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sanchez, E., Yamanoi, T.: Fuzzy ontologies for the semantic web. In: Larsen, H.L., Pasi, G., Ortiz-Arroyo, D., Andreasen, T., Christiansen, H. (eds.) FQAS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4027, pp. 691–699. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G., Tzouvaras, V., Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I.: Fuzzy OWL: Uncertainty and the Semantic Web. In: International Workshop of OWL: Experiences and Directions (OWL-ED2005), Galway, Ireland (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stojanovic, L., Stojanovic, N., Volz, R.: Migrating data-intensive web sites into the semantic Web. In: Proc. of the 17th ACM Symp. on Applied Computing, pp. 1100–1107. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas, C., Sheth, A.: On the Expressiveness of the Languages for the Semantic Web- Making a Case for ’A Little More’. In: Sanchez, E. (ed.) Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web. Elsevier, Amsterdam (March 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, Z., Cao, X., Dong, Y.: Formal approach and automated tool for translating ER schemata into OWL ontologies. In: Dai, H., Srikant, R., Zhang, C. (eds.) PAKDD 2004. LNCS, vol. 3056, pp. 464–475. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, Z., Zhang, S., Dong, Y.: Mapping between Relational Database Schema and OWL Ontology for Deep Annotation. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, December 18-22, pp. 548–552 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zvieli, A., Chen, P.P.: Entity-relationship modeling and fuzzy databases. In: Proc. 1986 IEEE Int. Conf. Data Engineering, Los Angeles, California, USA, pp. 320–327 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao, S., Chang, E.: From database to semantic web ontology: An overview. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM-WS 2007, Part II. LNCS, vol. 4806, pp. 1205–1214. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, F., Ma, Z.M., Wang, H., Meng, X. (2008). A Formal Semantics-Preserving Translation from Fuzzy Relational Database Schema to Fuzzy OWL DL Ontology. In: Domingue, J., Anutariya, C. (eds) The Semantic Web. ASWC 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5367. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89704-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89704-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89703-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89704-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics