Abstract
Fuzzy Description Logics are a family of logics which allow the representation of (and the reasoning with) structured knowledge affected by imprecision and vagueness. They were born to overcome the limitations of classical Description Logics when dealing with such kind of knowledge, but they bring out some new challenges, requiring an appropriate fuzzy language to be agreed and needing practical and highly optimized implementations of the reasoning algorithms. In the current paper we face these problems by presenting a reasoning preserving procedure to obtain a crisp representation for a fuzzy extension of the Description Logic \(\cal SHOIN\), which makes possible to reuse a crisp representation language as well as currently available reasoners, which have demonstrated a very good performance in practice. As additional contributions, we define the syntax and semantics of a novel fuzzy version of the nominal construct and allow to reason within fuzzy general concept inclusions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Scientific American 284(5), 34–43 (2001)
Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Baader, F., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Description logics as ontology languages for the semantic web. In: Hutter, D., Stephan, W. (eds.) Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2605, pp. 228–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338–353 (1965)
Lukasiewicz, T., Straccia, U.: Managing uncertainty and vagueness in description logics for the Semantic Web. Journal of Web Semantics (to appear)
W3C: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features
Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Reducing OWL entailment to description logic satisfiability. Journal of Web Semantics 1(4), 345–357 (2004)
Stoilos, G., Stamou, G., Tzouvaras, V., Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I.: Fuzzy OWL: Uncertainty and the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on OWL: Experience and Directions, OWLED 2005 (2005)
Sirin, E., Cuenca-Grau, B., Parsia, B.: From wine to water: Optimizing description logic reasoning for nominals. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2006), pp. 90–99 (2006)
Haarslev, V., Möller, R.: Racer system description. In: Goré, R.P., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds.) IJCAR 2001. LNCS, vol. 2083, pp. 701–705. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: fuzzyDL: An expressive fuzzy description logic reasoner. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ-IEEE 2008 (to appear, 2008)
Straccia, U.: Transforming fuzzy description logics into classical description logics. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3229, pp. 385–399. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Straccia, U.: Description logics over lattices. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 14(1), 1–16 (2006)
Kang, D., Lu, J., Xu, B., Li, Y., He, Y.: Two reasoning methods for extended fuzzy \(\mathcal{ALCH}\). In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3761, pp. 1588–1595. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Li, Y., Xu, B., Lu, J., Kang, D.: Reasoning technique for extended fuzzy \(\mathcal{ALCQ}\). In: Gavrilova, M.L., Gervasi, O., Kumar, V., Tan, C.J.K., Taniar, D., Laganá, A., Mun, Y., Choo, H. (eds.) ICCSA 2006. LNCS, vol. 3981, pp. 1179–1188. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Cuenca-Grau, B., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics 5(2), 51–53 (2007)
Straccia, U.: A Fuzzy Description Logic for the Semantic Web. In: Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web. Capturing Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 73–90. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)
Schaerf, A.: Reasoning with individuals in concept languages. Data & Knowledge Engineering 13(2), 141–176 (1994)
Hájek, P.: Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)
Klir, G.J., Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)
Straccia, U.: Reasoning within fuzzy description logics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 14, 137–166 (2001)
Straccia, U.: A fuzzy description logic. In: Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1998), pp. 594–599 (1998)
Nebel, B.: Terminological reasoning is inherently intractable. Artificial Intelligence 43(2), 235–249 (1990)
Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I.: OWL-Eu: Adding customised datatypes into OWL. Journal of Web Semantics 4, 29–39 (2006)
Horrocks, I., Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: The even more irresistible \(\mathcal{SROIQ}\). In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2006), pp. 452–457 (2006)
W3C: OWL 1.1 Web Ontology Language Overview (2006), http://www.w3.org/Submission/owl11-overview/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J. (2008). A Crisp Representation for Fuzzy \(\cal SHOIN\) with Fuzzy Nominals and General Concept Inclusions. In: da Costa, P.C.G., et al. Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web I. URSW URSW URSW 2006 2007 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5327. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89765-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89765-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89764-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89765-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)