Skip to main content

Inapproximability of Combinatorial Public Projects

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5385))

Abstract

We study the Combinatorial Public Project Problem (CPPP) in which n agents are assigned a subset of m resources of size k so as to maximize the social welfare. Combinatorial public projects are an abstraction of many resource-assignment problems (Internet-related network design, elections, etc.). It is known that if all agents have submodular valuations then a constant approximation is achievable in polynomial time. However, submodularity is a strong assumption that does not always hold in practice. We show that (unlike similar problems such as combinatorial auctions) even slight relaxations of the submodularity assumption result in non-constant lower bounds for approximation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alon, N., Matias, Y., Szegedy, M.: Jounal of computer and system sciences. The space complexity of approximating the frequency moment 58(1), 137–137 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen, D., Balakrishnan, H., Kaashoek, F., Morris, R.: Resilient overlay networks. In: SOSP 2001: Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, pp. 131–145. ACM, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Chun, B.-G., Fonseca, R., Stoica, I., Kubiatowicz, J.: Characterizing selfishly constructed overlay routing networks. In: INFOCOM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, E.H.: Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11, 17–33 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dobzinski, S., Nisan, N., Schapira, M.: Approximation algorithms for combinatorial auctions with complement-free bidders. In: STOC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dobzinski, S., Nisan, N.: Limitations of VCG-based mechanisms. In: STOC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dobzinski, S., Schapira, M.: An improved approximation algorithm for combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders. In: SODA 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feige, U.: On maximizing welfare when the utility functions are subadditive. In: STOC 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feigenbaum, J., Papadimitriou, C.H., Sami, R., Shenker, S.: A BGP-based mechanism for lowest-cost routing. Distributed Computing 18(1), 61–72 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Feigenbaum, J., Sami, R., Shenker, S.: Mechanism design for policy routing. In: PODC, pp. 11–20 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Groves, T.: Incentives in teams. Econometrica, 617–631 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kushilevitz, E., Nisan, N.: Communication Complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lehmann, B., Lehmann, D., Nisan, N.: Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities. In: ACM conference on electronic commerce (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Levin, H., Schapira, M., Zohar, A.: Interdomain routing and games. In: Proceedings of STOC 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nemhauser, G.L., Wolsey, L.A., Fisher, M.L.: An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions ii. Math. Programming Study 8, 73–87 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Nisan, N.: The communication complexity of approximate set packing and covering. In: Widmayer, P., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Hennessy, M., Eidenbenz, S., Conejo, R. (eds.) ICALP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2380. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nisan, N.: Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Papadimitriou, C.H., Schaira, M., Singer, Y.: On the hardness of being truthful. In: FOCS (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 8–37 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yao, A.C.-C.: Some complexity questions related to distributive computing. In: ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 209–213 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schapira, M., Singer, Y. (2008). Inapproximability of Combinatorial Public Projects. In: Papadimitriou, C., Zhang, S. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5385. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92185-1_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92185-1_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92184-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92185-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics