Skip to main content

Human Factors Affecting the Patient’s Acceptance of Wireless Biomedical Sensors

  • Conference paper
Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2008)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 25))

Abstract

In monitoring arrhythmia, the quality of medical data from the ECG sensors may be enhanced by being based on everyday life situations. Hence, the development of wireless biomedical sensors is of growing interest, both to diagnose the heart patient, as well as to adjust the regimen. However, human factors such as emotional barriers and stigmatization, may affect the patient’s behavior while wearing the equipment, which in turn may influence quality of data. The study of human factors and patient acceptance is important both in relation to the development of such equipment, as well as in evaluating the quality of data gathered from the individual patient. In this paper, we highlight some important aspects in patient acceptance by comparing results from a preliminary clinical trial with patients using a wireless ECG sensor for three days out-of-hospital service, to available published results from telehomecare projects, and discuss important aspects to be taken into account in future investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jones, V., van Haltern, A., Dokovsky, N., Koprinkov, G., Peuscher, J., Bults, R., et al.: Mobihealth: Mobile Health Services based on Body Area Networks. In: Istepanian, R.S.H., Laxminarayan, S., Pattichis, C.S. (eds.) M-Health: Emerging Mobile Health Systems, pp. 219–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Barlow, J., Wright, C., Sheasby, J., Turner, A., Hainsworth, J.: Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ. Couns. 48(2), 177–187 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dinesen, B., Nøhr, C., Andersen, S.K., Sejersen, H., Toft, E.: Under surveillance, yet looked after: Telehomecare as viewed by patients and their spouse/partners. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 7(3), 239–246 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lukowicz, P., Kirstein, T., Tröster, G.: Wearable systems for health care applications. Methods Inf. Med. 43(3), 232–238 (2004)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wootton, R., Kvedar, J.C.: Home Telehealth: Connecting Care Within the Community. RSM Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mair, F., Whitten, P.: Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 320(7248), 1517–1520 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams, T.L., May, C.R., Esmail, A.: Limitations of Patient Satisfaction Studies in Telehealthcare: A Systematic Review of the Litterature. Telemed. J. E Health 7(4), 293–316 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maglaveras, N., Chouvarda, I., Koutkias, V., Meletiadis, S., Haris, K., Balas, E.A.: Information Technology Can Enhance Quality in Regional Health Delivery. Methods Inf. Med. 41(5), 393–400 (2002)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman, C.P., Wyatt, J.C.: Evaluation Methods in Biomedical Informatics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Adlam, T., Orpwood, R., Dunn, T.: User evaluation in pervasive healthcare. In: Bardram, J.E., Mihailidis, A., Wan, D. (eds.) Pervasive Computing in Healthcare, USA, pp. 243–274. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaufmann, D.R., Patel, V.L., Hilliman, C., Morin, P.C., Pevzner, J., Weinstock, R.S., et al.: Usability in the real world: assessing medical information technologies in patients. homes. J. Biomed. Inform. 36, 45–60 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kushniruk, A.W., Patel, V.L.: Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J. Biomed. Inform. 37(1), 56–76 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lehoux, P.: Patients’ Perspectives on High-Tech Home Care: A Qualitative Inquiry into the User-Friendliness of Four Interventions. BMC Health Services Research 4, 28 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Haggard, P., Wolpert, D.M.: Disorders of body schema. In: Freund, H.-J. (ed.) Higher-order Motor Disorders: From Neuroanatomy and Neurobiology to Clinical Neurology, ch. 14, pp. 261–272. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hopp, F., Woodbridge, P., Subramanian, U., Copeland, L., Smith, D., Lowery, J.: Outcomes Associated with a Home Care Telehealth Intervention. Telemedicine and e-Health 12(3), 297–307 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fensli, R., Gunnarson, E., Gundersen, T.: A wearable ECG-recording System for Continuous Arrhythmia Monitoring in a Wireless Tele-Home-Care Situation. In: Proceedings 18th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, pp. 407–412 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huntleigh Healthcare. Medilog AR4 Digital Holter Recorder, http://www.medilogdarwin.com/Medilog_AR4.html

  18. Fensli, R., Pedersen, P.E., Gundersen, T., Hejlesen, O.: Sensor Acceptance Model - Measuring Patient Acceptance of Wearable Sensors. Methods Inf. Med. 47(1), 89–95 (2008)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ware, J.E., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J.E. How to Score Version 2 of the SF-36® Health Survey. Lincoln, RI. QualityMetric Incorporated (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Myers, S., Grant, R.W., Lugn, N.E., Holbert, B., Kvedar, J.C.: Impact of Home-Based Monitoring on the Care of Patients with Congestive Heart Failure. Home Health Care Management & Practice 18(6), 444 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fensli, R., Gundersen, T., Gunnarson, E.: Design Requirements for Long-Time ECG recordings in a Tele-Home-Care Situation, A Survey Study. In: Scandinavian Conference in Health Informatics, pp. 14–18 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Whitten, P., Mickus, M.: Home telecare for COPD/CHF patients: outcomes and perceptions. J. Telemed. Telecare 13(2), 69–73 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Scalvini, S., Capomolla, S., Zanelli, E., Benigno, M., Domenighini, D., Paletta, L., et al.: Effect of home-based telecardiology on chronic heart failure: costs and outcomes. J. Telemed. Telecare 11(S1), 16–18 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jaana, M., Pare, G.: Home telemonitoring of patients with diabetes: a systematic assessment of observed effects. J. Eval. Clin Pract. 13(2), 242–253 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fensli, R., Boisen, E. (2008). Human Factors Affecting the Patient’s Acceptance of Wireless Biomedical Sensors. In: Fred, A., Filipe, J., Gamboa, H. (eds) Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. BIOSTEC 2008. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 25. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92219-3_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92219-3_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92218-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92219-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics