Abstract
Privacy perservation, in terms of sensitive data access and management, is an important feature of decentralized calendar systems. Indeed, when users delegate their sensitive data such as timetables to an autonomous agent, this one executes many automatic data processing without their intervention: users lost a part of their data control. To tackle this problem, we propose in this article to extend a concrete application of calendars management multi-agent system by implementing a specific protocol for sensitive data transactions that represents the first step of privacy preservation in multi-agent systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agrawal, R., Kiernan, J., Srikant, R., Xu, Y.: Hippocratic databases. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Very Large Data Bases, pp. 143–154. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)
Bratman, M.E.: Intention, plans, and practical reason. O’Reilly, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)
Castelfranchi, C.: Engineering social order. In: Omicini, A., Tolksdorf, R., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) ESAW 2000. LNCS, vol. 1972, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Crépin, L., Demazeau, Y., Boissier, O., Jaquenet, F.: Sensitive data transaction in hippocratic multi-agent systems. In: 9th International Workshop Engineering Societies in the Agents World (2008)
Crépin, L., Vercouter, L., Jaquenet, F., Demazeau, Y., Boissier, O.: Hippocratic multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Entreprise Information Systems, pp. 301–308 (2008)
Demazeau, Y., Melaye, D., Verrons, M.-H.: A decentralized calendar system featuring sharing, trusting and negotiating. In: Ali, M., Dapoigny, R. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4031, pp. 731–740. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Deswarte, Y., Melchor, C.A.: Current and future privacy enhancing technologies for the internet. Annales des Télécommunications 61(3-4), 399–417 (2006)
Mathieu, P., Verrons, M.-H.: A general negotiation model using XML. Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour Journal 1, 523–542 (2005)
Rezgui, A., Ouzzani, M., Bouguettaya, A., Medjahed, B.: Preserving privacy in web services. In: Chiang, R.H.L., Lim, E.-P. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Web Information and Data Management, pp. 56–62. ACM, New York (2002)
Sichman, J.S., Demazeau, Y.: Exploiting social reasoning to deal with agency level inconsistency. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems, pp. 352–359. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1984)
W3C. Plateform for privacy preferences (2002), http://www.w3.org/p3p/
W3C. Owl web ontology language (2004), http://www.w3.org/tr/owl-features/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Crépin, L., Demazeau, Y., Boissier, O., Jacquenet, F. (2009). Privacy Preservation in a Decentralized Calendar System. In: Demazeau, Y., Pavón, J., Corchado, J.M., Bajo, J. (eds) 7th International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (PAAMS 2009). Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 55. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00487-2_56
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00487-2_56
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00486-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00487-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)