Skip to main content

Conceptualization of Pain: A Database for Lexical Typology

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language, and Computation (TbiLLC 2007)

Abstract

The paper presents a study in lexical typology. We focus on the semantic domain of pain as one of the most universal and complex areas of human experience. The predicates of unpleasant bodily sensations are compared in a sample of 23 languages. The collected material demonstrates that the use of pain verbs is dependent on the range of factors of different nature. This data heterogeneity poses the problem of cross-linguistic comparability of pain predicates. As a way to overcome this problem, we propose the construction of a typological database. The multidimensional classifications implemented in the database allow for various cross-linguistic generalizations on pain and human body conceptualizations as well as on regularities of semantic shifts in different languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rakhilina, E.V., Plungian, V.A.: O leksičeskoj tipologii [On lexical typology] (in Russian). In: Maisak, T., Rakhilina, E. (eds.) Tipologija glagolov dviženija v vode [Typology of AQUA-motion verbs], pp. 9–26. Indrik, Moscow (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koptjevskaya-Tamm, M.: Approaching lexical typology. In: Vanhove, M. (ed.) From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations. Benjamins, Amsterdam (forthc.)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berlin, B., Kay, P.: Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nerlove, S., Romney, A.K.: Sibling terminology and cross-sex behavior. American Anthropologist 69, 179–187 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenberg, J.: Universals of kinship terminology. In: Maquet, J. (ed.) On Linguistic Anthropology: Essays in Honor of Harry Hojer, Undena, Malibu, pp. 9–32 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goedemans, R.W.N., van der Hulst, H.G., Visch, E.A.M.: StressTyp: A Database for Word Prosodic Systems. Glot International 2(1/2), 21–23 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tiberius, C., Brown, D., Corbett, G.: A Typological Database of Agreement. In: Proceedings of LREC 2002, the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Las Palmas, Spain, pp. 1843–1846 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (1953)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Majid, A., Bowerman, M.: Cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. Special issue of Cognitive Linguistics 18(2) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maisak, T.A., Rakhilina, E.V. (eds.): Tipologija glagolov dviženija v vode [Typology of AQUA-motion verbs]. Indrik, Moscow (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lakoff, G.: Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Goossens, L. (ed.): By word of mouth: Metaphor, metonymy, and linguistic action in a cognitive perspective. Benjamins, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Comrie, B.: Language universals and linguistic typology. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 46, 3–14 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Croft, W.: Typology and universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Melzak, R.: The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1, 277–299 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bonch-Osmolovskaya, A., Rakhilina, E., Reznikova, T. (2009). Conceptualization of Pain: A Database for Lexical Typology. In: Bosch, P., Gabelaia, D., Lang, J. (eds) Logic, Language, and Computation. TbiLLC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5422. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00665-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00665-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00664-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00665-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics