Skip to main content

On Automatic Plagiarism Detection Based on n-Grams Comparison

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5478))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

When automatic plagiarism detection is carried out considering a reference corpus, a suspicious text is compared to a set of original documents in order to relate the plagiarised text fragments to their potential source. One of the biggest difficulties in this task is to locate plagiarised fragments that have been modified (by rewording, insertion or deletion, for example) from the source text.

The definition of proper text chunks as comparison units of the suspicious and original texts is crucial for the success of this kind of applications. Our experiments with the METER corpus show that the best results are obtained when considering low level word n-grams comparisons (n = {2,3}).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clough, P., Gaizauskas, R., Piao, S.: Building and Annotating a Corpus for the Study of Journalistic Text Reuse. In: 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2002), V, pp. 1678–1691. Las Palmas, Spain (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kang, N., Gelbukh, A.: PPChecker: Plagiarism Pattern Checker in Document Copy Detection. In: Sojka, P., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2006. LNCS, vol. 4188, pp. 661–667. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Lyon, C., Malcolm, J., Dickerson, B.: Detecting Short Passages of Similar Text in Large Document Collections. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Pennsylvania, pp. 118–125 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lyon, C., Barrett, R., Malcolm, J.: A Theoretical Basis to the Automated Detection of Copying Between Texts, and its Practical Implementation in the Ferret Plagiarism and Collusion Detector. In: Plagiarism: Prevention, Practice and Policies Conference, Newcastle, UK (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Porter, M.F.: An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping. Program 14(3), 130–137 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barrón-Cedeño, A., Rosso, P. (2009). On Automatic Plagiarism Detection Based on n-Grams Comparison. In: Boughanem, M., Berrut, C., Mothe, J., Soule-Dupuy, C. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5478. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00958-7_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00958-7_69

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00957-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00958-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics