Skip to main content

Analyzing Router Responsiveness to Active Measurement Probes

  • Conference paper
Passive and Active Network Measurement (PAM 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 5448))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Active probing has increasingly been used to collect information about the topological and functional characteristics of the Internet. Given the need for active probing and the lack of a widely accepted mechanism to minimize the overhead of such probes, the traffic and processing overhead introduced on the routers are believed to become an important issue for network operators. In this paper, we conduct an experimental study to understand the responsiveness of routers to active probing both from a historical perspective and current practices. One main finding is that network operators are increasingly configuring their devices not to respond to active direct probes. In addition, ICMP based probes seem to elicit most responses and UDP based probes elicit the least.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archipelago Measurement Infrastructure, http://www.caida.org/projects/ark

  2. Chun, B., Culler, D., Roscoe, T., Bavier, A., Peterson, L., Wawrzoniak, M., Bowman, M.: PlanetLab: an overlay testbed for broad-coverage services. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 33(3), 3–12 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Donnet, B., Huffaker, B., Friedman, T., Claffy, K.: Increasing the coverage of a cooperative internet topology discovery algorithm. In: Akyildiz, I.F., Sivakumar, R., Ekici, E., Oliveira, J.C.d., McNair, J. (eds.) NETWORKING 2007. LNCS, vol. 4479, pp. 738–748. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Donnet, B., Raoult, P., Friedman, T., Crovella, M.: Efficient algorithms for large-scale topology discovery. In: Proceedings of ACM/SIGMETRICS, pp. 327–338 (June 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donnet, B., Raoult, P., Friedman, T., Crovella, M.: Deployment of an algorithm for large-scale topology discovery. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 24, 2210–2220 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gunes, M., Sarac, K.: Analytical IP alias resolution. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Istanbul, Turkey (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gunes, M., Sarac, K.: Resolving anonymous routers in Internet topology measurement studies. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Phoenix, AZ, USA (April 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jin, X., Tu, W., Chan, S.-H.: Scalable and efficient end-to-end network topology inference. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 19(6), 837–850 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katz-Bassett, E., Madhyastha, H., John, J., Krishnamurthy, A., Wetherall, D., Anderson, T.: Studying black holes in the Internet with hubble. In: Proceedings of USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, San Fransicso, CA, USA (April 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Madhyastha, H.V., Isdal, T., Piatek, M., Dixon, C., Anderson, T., Krishnamurthy, A., Venkataramani, A.: iPlane: An information plane for distributed services. In: OSDI (November 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McRobb, D., Claffy, K., Monk, T.: Skitter: CAIDA’s macroscopic Internet topology discovery and tracking tool (1999), http://www.caida.org/tools/skitter/

  12. Nakao, A., Peterson, L., Bavier, A.: A routing underlay for overlay networks. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 11–18 (August 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shavitt, Y., Shir, E.: DIMES: Let the Internet measure itself. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 35(5), 71–74 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spring, N., Mahajan, R., Wetherall, D., Anderson, T.: Measuring ISP topologies using rocketfuel. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 12(1), 2–16 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Triukose, S., Wen, Z., Derewecki, A., Rabinovich, M.: Dipzoom: An open ecosystem for network measurements. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, AK, USA (May 2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gunes, M.H., Sarac, K. (2009). Analyzing Router Responsiveness to Active Measurement Probes. In: Moon, S.B., Teixeira, R., Uhlig, S. (eds) Passive and Active Network Measurement. PAM 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5448. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00975-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00975-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00974-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00975-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics