Abstract
This chapter presents a process-oriented approach to support assessment in learning networks. Assessment in its broadest sense can be conceived as the ‘systematic gathering of information and evidence about a person’s properties (qualifications), based on a process, a product or the progress of a person, for the purposes of certification, placement or diagnoses in formative and summative contexts’ (Joosten-ten Brinke et al. 2007). This definition includes classical assessment and complex assessment.
.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Almond, R. G., Steinberg, L., Mislevy, R. J.: A sample assessment using the four process framework. CSE Report 543 (Center for study of evaluation, Los Angeles, University of California 2001)
APIS. Assessment Provision through Interoperable Segments: http://www.elearning.ac.uk/resources/1apisoverview. Cited May 1 2008
AQuRate homepage: http://aqurate.kingston.ac.uk/index.htm. Cited May 1 2008
Boud, D., Cohen, R., Sampson, J.: Peer learning and assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 24, 413–426 (1999)
Freeman, M., McKenzie, J.: Implementing and evaluating SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 33, 553–572 (2002)
Gehringer, E.F.: Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses. In: Proceedings of the 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Charlotte, North Carolina 2001
Gipps, C.: Socio-cultural perspective on assessment. Rev. Res. Educ. 24, 355–392 (1999)
Hermans, H. et al.: Educational Model for Assessment, version 1.0 (2006), http://hdl.handle.net/1820/308. Cited May 1 2008
IMS Learning Design specification, version 1.0 (IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. 2003). http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/index.cfm. Cited May 1 2008
IMS Question & Test Interoperability, version 2.1 (IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. 2006). http://www.imsglobal.org/question/index.cfm. Cited May 1 2008
Joosten-ten Brinke, D. et al.: Modelling assessment for re-use of traditional and new types of assessment. Comp. Hum. Behav. 23, 2721–2741 (2007)
Koper, E. J. R., Olivier. B.: Representing the learning design of units of learning. Educ. Technol. Soc. 7, 97–111 (2004)
Lockyer, J.: Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 23, 4–12 (2003)
Miao, Y., Sloep, P., Koper, R.: Modelling units of assessment for sharing assessment process information: towards an assessment process specification, In: Advances in Web Based Learning -- Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web-based Learning, ed. by Li, F. B. J et al., ICWL 2008, Jinhua, China, August 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5145 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2008a) pp. 132–144
Miao, Y. et al.: Bridging the gap between practitioners and e-learning standards: a domain-specific modelling approach. In: Times of Convergence. Technologies Across Learning Contexts -- Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, ed. by Dillenbourg, P., Specht, M., EC-TEL 2008, Maastricht, The Netherlands, September 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5192 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2008b) pp. 284–289
SLeD: Service Based Learning Design System (2005) http://sled.open.ac.uk/. Cited May 1 2008
Topping, K. J.: Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities Rev. Educat. Res. 68, 249–276 (1998)
Vogten, H., Martens, H.: ‘CopperCore’ http://www.coppercore.org. (2004)
Vogten, H. et al.: CopperCore Service Integration -- integrating IMS Learning Design and IMS Question and Test Interoperability. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Kerkrade, The Netherlands (IEEE Computer Society, 2006) pp. 378–382
Volder, M. D. et al.: Espace: a new Web-tool for peer assessment with in-built feedback quality system. In: Proceedings of ABR & TLC Conference, 2007, Hawaii, USA, 2007
Wills, G. et al.: R2Q2: rendering and responses processing for QTIv2 question types. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, ed. by Danson, M. (Loughborough University, UK 2006) pp. 515–522
Zoho Challenge: http://zohochallenge.com/OnlineTest/Candidate.do. Cited May 1 2008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miao, Y., Hermans, H. (2009). A Process-Oriented Approach to Support Multi-Role Multi-Stage E-Assessment: A Case Study. In: Koper, R. (eds) Learning Network Services for Professional Development. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00978-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00978-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00977-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00978-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)