Skip to main content

Model Checking by Generating Observers from an Interface Specification Between Components

  • Conference paper
Information Systems: Modeling, Development, and Integration (UNISCON 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 20))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1150 Accesses

Abstract

In the field of embedded software systems where many kinds of systems must be developed in a short period of time and at low cost, model checking, which is one of the automatic design verification techniques, is expected to become easy for software designers to use. The difficulties of model checking include the describing of queries or observers as the system property to be verified, and the analyzing of a counterexample in order to find the cause of a fault. There are methods to solve these problems such as generating observers from ordinary software design formats describing system behavior rules, and comparing that behavior with a counterexample to locate a reason for the fault. In this paper, a method generating observers from a timing diagram that describes an interface specification between two components is proposed. The purpose is to make it possible for designers to describe queries of verification easily and also analyze counterexamples easily. In addition, the result of applying this method to a communication protocol application is reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berard, B., Bidoit, M., Finkel, A., Laroussinie, F., Petit, A., Petrucci, L., Schnoebelen, P., Mckenzie, P.: Systems and Software Verification: Model-Checking Techniques and Tools. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Havelund, K., Lowry, M., Penix, J.: Formal analysis of a space craft controller using Spin. In: Proc. of 4th International SPIN Workshop (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Janssen, W., Mateescu, R., Mauw, S., Springintveld, J.: Verifying business processes using SPIN. In: Proc. of 4th International SPIN Workshop (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lindahl, M., Pettersson, P., Yi, W.: Formal Design and Analysis of a Gear-Box Controller. In: Steffen, B. (ed.) TACAS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1384, p. 281. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bengtsson, J., Griffioen, W.O.D., Kristoffersen, K.J., Larsen, K.G., Larsson, F., Pettersson, P., Yi, W.: Verification of an Audio Protocol with Bus Collision Using Uppaal. In: Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A. (eds.) CAV 1996. LNCS, vol. 1102. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Behrmann, G., David, A., Larsen, K.G.: A Tutorial on Uppaal. In: Bernardo, M., Corradini, F. (eds.) SFM-RT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3185, pp. 200–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. David, A., Moller, M.O., Yi, W.: Formal Verification of UML Statecharts with Real-Time Extensions. In: Kutsche, R.-D., Weber, H. (eds.) FASE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2306, p. 218. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. David, A., Moller, M.O.: From HUPPAAL to UPPAAL: Translation from hierarchical timed automata to flat timed automata, BRICS Technical report series, RS-01-11 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dwyer, M.B., Avrunin, G.S, Corbett, J.C.: Patterns in Property Specifications for Finite-State Verification. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (May 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Inverardi, P., Muccini, H., Pelliccione, P.: Automated Check of Architectural Models Consistency Using SPIN. In: Proc. of 16th ASE 2001(2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Firley, T., Huhn, M., Diethers, K., Gehrke, T., Goltz, U.: Timed Sequence Diagrams and Tool-Based Analysis A Case Study. In: France, R.B., Rumpe, B. (eds.) UML 1999. LNCS, vol. 1723, pp. 645–660. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Bengtsson, J., Wang, Y.: Timed automata: Semantics, algorithms and tools. In: Desel, J., Reisig, W., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) Lectures on Concurrency and Petri Nets. LNCS, vol. 3098, pp. 87–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hasegawa, T., Fukazawa, Y. (2009). Model Checking by Generating Observers from an Interface Specification Between Components. In: Yang, J., Ginige, A., Mayr, H.C., Kutsche, RD. (eds) Information Systems: Modeling, Development, and Integration. UNISCON 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 20. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01112-2_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01112-2_53

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01111-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01112-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics