Skip to main content

A Meta-modeling Framework to Support Accountability in Business Process Modeling

  • Conference paper
Information Systems: Modeling, Development, and Integration (UNISCON 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 20))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Accountability is becoming a central theme in business today in the midst of global financial crisis as the corporate scandals and fallouts dominate the front pages of the press. Businesses are demanding more accountability measures built-in at the business process modeling level. Currently the business process modeling standards and methods mainly focus on the sequential flow aspect of business process and leave the business aspect of accountability largely untouched. In this paper, we extend the OMG’s business modeling specifications to define a business accountability meta-model. The meta-model is complementary to the OMG’s Model-Driven Architecture (MDA) vision, laying out the foundation for future model generation and transformation for creating accountable business process solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. OMG: Business Motivation Model, v1.0, Object Management Group (2008), http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/1.0/PDF

  2. OMG: Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR), v1.0, Object Manage Group (2008), http://www.omg.org/spec/SBVR/1.0/PDF

  3. OMG: Business Process Definition MetaModel, Volume I: Common Infrastructure, Object Management Group (2008), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPDM/1.0

  4. OMG: Business Process Modeling Notation, v1.1, Object Management Group (2008), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/1.1/PDF

  5. 88Solutions, Adaptive and et al: Organization Structure Metamodel (OSM), 2nd Initial Submission, Object Management Group (2006), www.omg.org/docs/bmi/06-11-02.pdf

  6. OMG, Business Rules Representation, Object Management Group (2007), http://www.omg.org/spec/PRR/1.0/

  7. Oakes, L.S., Young, J.J.: Accountability re-examined: evidence from Hull House. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21(6), 765–790 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schedler, A.: Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, pp. 13–28. Lynne Reiner Publishers (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gibbins, M., Newton, J.: An empirical exploration of complex accountability in public accounting. Journal of Accounting Research 32(2), 165–186 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zou, J., Pavlovski, C.J.: Towards Accountable Enterprise Mashup Services. In: IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE 2007), Hong Kong, pp. 205–212 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jones, C.B.: Systematic Software Development Using VDM, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kailar, R.: Reasoning about Accountability in Protocols for Electronic Commerce. In: Proceedings of 1995 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, p. 236. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou, J., Gollman, D.: A fair non-repudiation protocol. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposioum on Security and Privacy. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson, P., Cook, N., Shrivastrava, S.: Implementing fair non-repudiable interactions with Web services. In: Proceedings of Ninth IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tseng, M.M., Chuan, J.S., Ma, Q.H.: Accountability Centered Approach to business process reengineering. In: Proceedings of the 31st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 345–354 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, Y., Lin, K.J., Yu, T.: Accountability in Service-Oriented Architecture: Computing with Reasoning and Reputation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering, pp. 123–131 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. List, B., Korherr, B.: A UML 2 Profile for Business Process Modeling. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Momm, C., Malec, R., Abeck, S.: Towards a Model-driven Development of Monitored Process. In: Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik, WI 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. OMG, Model Driven Architecture (2008), http://www.omg.org/mda/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zou, J., De Vaney, C., Wang, Y. (2009). A Meta-modeling Framework to Support Accountability in Business Process Modeling. In: Yang, J., Ginige, A., Mayr, H.C., Kutsche, RD. (eds) Information Systems: Modeling, Development, and Integration. UNISCON 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 20. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01112-2_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01112-2_54

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01111-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01112-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics